Forums

The Amethyst Library

Quick find code: 49-50-80-60871629

Poller5
Dec Member 2023

Poller5

Posts: 11,421 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Alright, Nick, I've read your story.

You mention in the first post that you don't have an editor, so the grammar isn't perfect. This is true in the same sense that saying Michael Jordan was okay at putting a ball through a hoop: it's rather a gross understatement. Your grammar was a mess. Beyond the typos, which are unavoidable and excusable (to an extent), you had more problem with nouns, verbs, and tenses than I think I've seen in any other writing on this forum. Really, all I can suggest on that front is a thorough proofread -- the errors are so blatant they should not be hard to identify.

Beyond that, your writing style has the hints of something interesting -- the naive, first person narrator, was a neat perspective -- but this is at almost every turn overshadowed by long, unwieldy sentences and unbearably awkward phrases. The fight scenes which dominated the first two thirds of the story should have been as thrilling and exciting as (I'm sure) you imagined them to be, but your words never managed to convey that.

Finally, your plot. It's not bad, but it's very fragmentary. Too much of the beginning is taken up with fights that do very little to give the reader any perspective on your character, and the potential element of the mystery of his appearance and his growth as a fighter within the dungeons of Daemonheim is entirely skipped over. By jumping from fight to fight with nothing in between, you don't allow the reader to realize that he's a different fighter in the second one, a much more capable than he was in the first.

As a postscript, I'd like to point out that some of the elements of your plot had major believability issues. Firstly, the way you explained it he should never have survived, let alone won, that first battle -- and that's still going on your errant assumption that a spear through his chest wouldn't kill him. The later battle also makes little sense: why are these four heroes defending the person he attacked, and, moreover...

10-Mar-2013 09:07:50

Poller5
Dec Member 2023

Poller5

Posts: 11,421 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Why did he even attack him in the first place? It just doesn't make sense.

With all that in mind, I'm afraid that I really can't give you a higher rank than Penman. You're dragged down heavily by your poor grammar, and if you look over it, and fix that up, you'd probably be able to make the jump to Scribe. Some further editing of the battles, pacing, and general writing would set up an eventual rise to Bard, should you decide to continue the story at a concomitantly higher level.

10-Mar-2013 09:10:43

ReubenNick
Jul Member 2019

ReubenNick

Posts: 685 Steel Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Aye, thank you for the detailed response. I'll most likely end up rewriting or editing it in the coming months but until then I shall maintain my Penman title within the Library. I knew my grammar would be the worst lol but what can I say? Practice is key.

The rank of a Maestro or Novelist is what awaits me upon my return.

==!+Suki+!==
+Penman of The Amethyst Library+

10-Mar-2013 17:27:14 - Last edited on 10-Mar-2013 17:37:18 by ReubenNick

Chosen Worf

Chosen Worf

Posts: 929 Gold Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
In that case, I will withdraw my application until I can submit something of length. I personally don't agree that length should determine the quality of the author: for example, Ernest Hemingway's "For sale: baby shoes, never worn."

However, I will respect the guild's policy.

10-Mar-2013 18:08:54

Poller5
Dec Member 2023

Poller5

Posts: 11,421 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I will add your name to the Library's lists, then, Nick. I look forward to your resubmission.

Alright, Worf. As much as I too can admire Hemingway's tribute to laconic pith, it seems we're going to have to agree to disagree on that front.

10-Mar-2013 21:11:47

Quick find code: 49-50-80-60871629 Back to Top