Hey Elly,
Well I've read the story, but I admit that I had trouble really getting into it. Your descriptive work is often very good and goes some way towards carrying the work, and the pace of the plot is generally well measured too, so you do a lot of the basic stuff well. So why did I have a problem enjoying it?
Unfortunately I found it to be too cliched and not believable enough to draw me into your world. The characters were not fleshed out as much as they could have been. Much of what I got to understand from them was how they were reacting physically to the situations they were in, but not much of real depth about how they felt.
Emotion is critically important to getting me, the reader, to empathize with a character, or dislike a character, or feel whatever you want me to feel at a given point. And it is that which draws me in and makes me want to see what will happen next.
For instance, Adam was thrown into that mud pit in the mines, and I got lots of detail about how dirty he was, but nothing much about whether he was annoyed, resigned, panicking...
A notable exception to this complaint was when Adam and Rachel kissed in the rain in Varrock. It was such a huge relief to see that in the story, finally making something out of those feelings you'd been telling us about but not really demonstrating. You could have done more, but I applaud you for that.
A more minor point was my feeling of having to suspend realism. I couldn't always believe that things would really work they way you described, such as right near the beginning when Rachel couldn't escape from being tied to a chair. But then she has a "spark or rage", breaks her ropes and incinerates someone. But then she's captured and tied up again. There were several places (like that scene) where I didn't understand why the aggressors didn't simply kill them.
20-Oct-2009 04:41:56