Back to the point, I just thought that, as they are besieging a place, the knights would already know what to do. But yeah, their priority would be defending their king. Or, maybe you’re foreshadowing a weakness, and that the knights’ reliance on orders may be something that can be exploited.
Regarding hand-to-hand combat, it may seem daunting to have to face someone vastly more powerful than yourself. However, skill, technique and agility very often triumphs over strength. Of course, the foes themselves would also have superior reflexes and efficiency. But a good wrestler, who happens to be thin, can take down a giant if he’s caught off-guard.
Ah, yes, maybe the nobles don’* want to get their hands dirty (so to speak). In Ancient India, there was a caste system, and every time a nobleman, say, was attacked by a thug, he would simply rely on stomping into the legs to break knees, as well as striking the eyes and throat, solely to not even touch the lowly peasant. The culture considered touching lowly people unclean, and so must be avoided at all costs, even in combat.
(Well, if I had to fight superhuman knights, cheap shots like eye gouging, biting the trachea, grabbing, squeezing, twisting and pulling the private parts, or, most historically disgusting, ramming the tip of a weapon into someone’s behind, would be things I’d consider!)
Ah, Soter, and his headless scene. Actually, now that I have a chance, to what extent is this superhuman capability? Superhuman, as in, say, having the strength and agility several times beyond ordinary possibility, or superhuman as in using magic or altering physics at will? Or maybe half and half?
Oh, I did not notice the other instances of half-swording. To show it better, a good idea would be to include something *gripped one hand on the blade” but, well, as a swordsman, I really should have noticed those. *D
My remark about Beatrice was me being silly. And I meant to put D: instead of a smiley. Stupid smiley.
22-Aug-2014 22:50:39