Original message details are unavailable.
I was hesitant to submit it at first as I firmly believe that literature that is made up of obscure references is wrong, as it limits who can read and be effected by your work. But I liked the insect-writing noises metaphor so much I chose to in the end.
You'd hate classical literature, then; at one point from the 300s-200s BC, the more obscure and referential your work, the better is was considered. Though later, Vergil's
Aeneid
does the same thing a fair bit. As a classicist, I actually quite like the allusiveness of some poetry (poetry is always worse for it), but I'm "in on the joke", so to speak, and I can understand why others would dislike it. Personally, my view has been that if a work was written to be enjoyed in that way, it's the burden of the audience to educate themselves, not of the author to make it universally accessible.
Original message details are unavailable.
I'd love to be immortal, but I would want that immortality to come with some sort of thing where I could choose to die, on the off chance I ever really wanted to.
Nam Sibyllam quidem Cumis ego ipse oculis meis vidi in ampulla pendere, et <c>um illi pueri dicerent: "Sibylla ti theleis;" respondebat illa: "Apothanein thelo."
(Just to commit the very sin about which Cyun just complained!)
01-Mar-2014 05:59:21
- Last edited on
01-Mar-2014 06:00:58
by
Poller5