Forums
Dev blog: PvP worlds & Poll 11
Quick find code: 380-381-49-65435545
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Honestly the only way the ancient equipment would work is having a repair cost, let's say 30m for each melee item and 1m for the range weapons. Obviously you guys would decide the final amount, but 30m and 1m seems reasonable considering it would be pure cash taken from the economy.
I would imagine the ancient equipment was created in order to encourage PKers to use the PvP worlds over the dangerous Clan Wars (at a time when there was no Wilderness). If it's not a reward, is it worth having at all?
Don't you see the problem though? Read my post on the last page again. To sum it up, I could be risking 70m in gear against a player with full rune, dragon scim and a vls with 1% charge left. Sure I should be willing to lose/risk my items, but someone with a vls at 1% charge killing me for all of that, and being at an advantage nonetheless seems rather... stupid.
edit: ancient equipment would function like barrows equipment, it's either 0 or 100 upon death. The weapons would still be very valuable, and could still be sold for a nice profit. You either sell for 10m (who knows how much the real price would be) at 0, or pay the 30m to use/sell for 40m. So let's say a player gets a vls that player A had at 1% charge, they would be getting an item they could sell rather than a vls that is almost useless to them.
Original message details are unavailable.
Honestly the only way the ancient equipment would work is having a repair cost, let's say 30m for each melee item and 1m for the range weapons. Obviously you guys would decide the final amount, but 30m and 1m seems reasonable considering it would be pure cash taken from the economy.
I would imagine the ancient equipment was created in order to encourage PKers to use the PvP worlds over the dangerous Clan Wars (at a time when there was no Wilderness). If it's not a reward, is it worth having at all?
Don't you see the problem though? Read my post on the last page again. To sum it up, I could be risking 70m in gear against a player with full rune, dragon scim and a vls with 1% charge left. Sure I should be willing to lose/risk my items, but someone with a vls at 1% charge killing me for all of that, and being at an advantage nonetheless seems rather... stupid.
edit: ancient equipment would function like barrows equipment, it's either 0 or 100 upon death. The weapons would still be very valuable, and could still be sold for a nice profit. You either sell for 10m (who knows how much the real price would be) at 0, or pay the 30m to use/sell for 40m. So let's say a player gets a vls that player A had at 1% charge, they would be getting an item they could sell rather than a vls that is almost useless to them.
04-Oct-2013 21:07:53 - Last edited on 04-Oct-2013 21:12:28 by Bebop Blues
Thanks for the reply!
How is it people bring the more promising ideas to you directly then? I have a few good ones with a lot of support on the forums which would be worth looking at
How is it people bring the more promising ideas to you directly then? I have a few good ones with a lot of support on the forums which would be worth looking at
04-Oct-2013 21:11:23
Quick find code: 380-381-49-65435545 Back to Top