forums.rs

Forums

Dev Blog: Bounty Hunter 2

Quick find code: 380-381-43-65435531

of 30
OA
Sep Member 2019

OA

Posts: 613 Steel Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Rawrylol is the current example of what is wrong with the game. Kids like him need to legit not be allowed to vote if they haven't stepped foot in the wilderness.

Anyways, I voted no because you rushed this update, disregarded ALL feedback, I mean 50k lol? Pking is not profitable, you know it, pkers know it, skillers are oblivious to it. Make pking profitable, return the ACTUAL craters people want, and raise the limit from 50k to 250k and maybe people will vote yes.

17-Jul-2014 19:58:52

1uz 6 speed
Sep Member 2022

1uz 6 speed

Posts: 302 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
Rawrylol is the current example of what is wrong with the game. Kids like him need to legit not be allowed to vote if they haven't stepped foot in the wilderness.

Anyways, I voted no because you rushed this update, disregarded ALL feedback, I mean 50k lol? Pking is not profitable, you know it, pkers know it, skillers are oblivious to it. Make pking profitable, return the ACTUAL craters people want, and raise the limit from 50k to 250k and maybe people will vote yes.

Not necessarly 250k but here is an idea i had yesterday ... make the required alc value level-dependant so that
lvl 3-30 = 25k alc value
lvl 30-50 = 50k alc value
lvl 50-75 = 75k alc value
lvl 75-100 = 100k alc value
lvl 100+ = 200k alc value

i think that this would be a step in the right direction

17-Jul-2014 20:01:56

Rawrylol

Rawrylol

Posts: 1,176 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
I'm 100% sure that if you lost 500k+ per bandos trip you would certainly not enjoy it and you can't compare mini-games' loss to pking's loss seriously ... for the same amount of time, you will lose alot more money pking as it is right now than doing mini games. More people will quit due to not having incentive/BH rather than the amount of people who will quit if there is such incentive and that's for sure because the PvM community is alot more resilient to updates than the Pking community which in turn make the Pking community much more volatile

Surely you're only losing that much if you're dying every time? You yourself just said 1 inventory is 63k. Even if you only have a K/D of 1:1 (Which is apparently very bad), that means you'd have to die 8 times to lose 500k as the cost of the armour you'd receive from the 1 kill would balance out with the armour you would lose from the 1 death. And then you've also got to take into consideration that you wouldn't necessarily use your whole inventory and that you might be able to kill the other person before they use up their whole inventory, offsetting the cost. So yeah, seems a little bit of an exaggeration there.

And no, not many people would quit because of a lack of an update, in this case an incentive to use BH.

Original message details are unavailable.
The belief that players will 'quit' if an update doesn't come is non-existent, we have stats to prove this simply doesn't happen, so we have little to no concern with this.

Taken from the horses mouth.

17-Jul-2014 20:05:00

Jerksauce
Mar Member 2024

Jerksauce

Posts: 487 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
what all of you are asking for would totally destroy the economy.Did any of you actually play RS when the down spiral started?It looks like not.Or You would Remember What kind of damage Statues and the like did.

17-Jul-2014 20:06:02

Rawrylol

Rawrylol

Posts: 1,176 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
Rawrylol is the current example of what is wrong with the game. Kids like him need to legit not be allowed to vote if they haven't stepped foot in the wilderness.

Anyways, I voted no because you rushed this update, disregarded ALL feedback, I mean 50k lol? Pking is not profitable, you know it, pkers know it, skillers are oblivious to it. Make pking profitable, return the ACTUAL craters people want, and raise the limit from 50k to 250k and maybe people will vote yes.

1. Not a kid.
2. Things that happen in the wilderness have an effect on things outside the wilderness.
3. You shouldn't be allowed to vote in anything that you don't interact with then, right?

17-Jul-2014 20:07:13

Sfa05

Sfa05

Posts: 128 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
Voted No on BH due to untradeables. You should be able to pick them up on death!
People will fight in painted rune kites and helmets, or torso, penance skirt, fighter hat, and rune defender for melee, and full void + painted kiteshield for range.

That's anti-fun as you can literally get 0 items from them. Being able to return for untradeables is not a good mechanic, and if they want to use them so badly they can stick to PvP worlds.

Original message details are unavailable.

And no, not many people would quit because of a lack of an update, in this case an incentive to use BH.

Original message details are unavailable.
The belief that players will 'quit' if an update doesn't come is non-existent, we have stats to prove this simply doesn't happen, so we have little to no concern with this.

Taken from the horses mouth.

Mod Ronan may not be the brightest crayon in the box then. What happened to RS3's PvPers? When a game stops being fun people quit. If the wild gets inactive PvPers will start leaving. That's the way it has always worked. It's hard to use statistics to prove or disprove this, but we've seen plenty of times how updates can hurt the game and more importantly how lack of action from mods can as well. Not making PvP more enticing will definitely hurt the game.

17-Jul-2014 20:14:29

Sfa05

Sfa05

Posts: 128 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Rawrylol is the current example of what is wrong with the game. Kids like him need to legit not be allowed to vote if they haven't stepped foot in the wilderness.

Anyways, I voted no because you rushed this update, disregarded ALL feedback, I mean 50k lol? Pking is not profitable, you know it, pkers know it, skillers are oblivious to it. Make pking profitable, return the ACTUAL craters people want, and raise the limit from 50k to 250k and maybe people will vote yes.

1. Not a kid.
2. Things that happen in the wilderness have an effect on things outside the wilderness.
3. You shouldn't be allowed to vote in anything that you don't interact with then, right?
For point 3, you can if you want but you're obviously not very well versed on PvP situations and you also voted impulsively because you fear something that they haven't even mentioned. You're trying to punish everyone because a few people mentioned wanting rewards like we used to have (statuettes). Instead of trying to walk a mile in their shoe and find out why it is they want statuettes you just automatically say "no". People with little to no empathy shouldn't be allowed to vote, but since we can't really factor for that then I guess feel free to continue on.

17-Jul-2014 20:17:04

Quick find code: 380-381-43-65435531 Back to Top