My suggestions (PVP):
Void melee: Nerf it, you guys stated that low level gear with low risk should not be on par with the high level gear. As of now, the melee void maxes the same exact as someone using the best strength defence gear such as Bandos, BGloves, and Nezzy/Serp which all have higher requirements. For example, someone in maxed defensive strength gear, can max an 82 with an AGS, and void can do the exact same damage, same thing with a whip, and the other melee weapons. Nerf set to 5%, it can still do 79 max, so maybe melee loses 1-3 damage with it's weapons, not too harsh as to range void losing 8 damage off its HBallista. 79 is still too good in my opinion for low level gear with low risk.
Buff Mage Void, It is subpar, I believe a 7.5% damage buff, and more accuracy would fix it. Reason: If you gave the 7.5% buff it would max at 40, not too bad. Also, there is no magic + stat, so it does need some more accuracy; at least better than mystic/close to Ahrims. HOWEVER, if you buff mage void realize that you MUST nerf melee void, people will rush, and do 40 mage + 82 AGS stacks.
Put void range at 15%, or buff some of its weapons. Reason: 10% reduction across the board is a big nerf. You guys pretty much dropped a bomb on void range pures, and tank rangers, so I think it would be better if you kind of eased into the nerf. For example, 10% nerf like you did, but buff something, like onyx bolts, karils X bow, maybe even make a Ballista recover SOME of its damage back or make special more accurate. People put a lot of work into their accounts, and grinding HBallista, I will explain why I believe that it should recover SOME of its damage or have a more accurate special.
Melee pkers can use 300+ defence bonus armor, and still hit 82 with ags, 50s with whip, 44s with dds, 70s with DWHammer, and so on. I feel that if a ranger uses bad defensive void armor, it should be able to sort of hit close to an ags, right now the max is 72, maybe give it a 5% buff=~77 max
26-May-2017 15:36:33
- Last edited on
26-May-2017 15:55:31
by
ABUSlVE