Forums
Wilderness & PvP Improvements
Quick find code: 380-381-367-65887036
Fluency
said
:
I thought there was this goal of making influence of affected groups greater on polls so minorities in the community can still be catered for.
Re poll the lvl 1-5 bh targets and give it a 50 bh kills requirement to vote. The current situation is a pain in the ass for pretty much all bh pkers, the only reason it didn't pass is because of non pkers voting.
In addition to what Barca stated, I don't think non-pkers are responsible for that not passing (at least not for downvoting it out of spite), since many other content ideas did pass (actually, this PvP poll was pretty mild in the "add content to entice non-pkers into the wildy" department (aside from the , which I greatly appreciated.
Looking at the poll question and its results, I'm guessing it was due to one these factors:
-Not a lot of people know what Bounty Hunter IS, so it's hard to tell if it's a good idea or a bad idea before looking it up (which could explain the remarkably high % of voters that skipped that question).
-Among the pkers interested in pker-v-pker fights (rather than pker-v-skiller or pker-v-PvMer), I've seen some of them say they want more reasons to explore the majority of the wilderness to fight (rather than just levels 1-5 near Edgeville). This update would've been the opposite of that, so maybe those pkers didn't like the idea.
.
.
.
I'm GRATEFUL to this poll now, though. I now understand what Bounty Hunter is and how it works much better now. And I can confidently say that I LIKE BOUNTY HUNTER
It's only in one world and there's no non-bounty-hunter incentives to use the wilderness of that world, so only pkers should be in the wilderness in that world. BRILLIANT!
I thought there was this goal of making influence of affected groups greater on polls so minorities in the community can still be catered for.
Re poll the lvl 1-5 bh targets and give it a 50 bh kills requirement to vote. The current situation is a pain in the ass for pretty much all bh pkers, the only reason it didn't pass is because of non pkers voting.
In addition to what Barca stated, I don't think non-pkers are responsible for that not passing (at least not for downvoting it out of spite), since many other content ideas did pass (actually, this PvP poll was pretty mild in the "add content to entice non-pkers into the wildy" department (aside from the , which I greatly appreciated.
Looking at the poll question and its results, I'm guessing it was due to one these factors:
-Not a lot of people know what Bounty Hunter IS, so it's hard to tell if it's a good idea or a bad idea before looking it up (which could explain the remarkably high % of voters that skipped that question).
-Among the pkers interested in pker-v-pker fights (rather than pker-v-skiller or pker-v-PvMer), I've seen some of them say they want more reasons to explore the majority of the wilderness to fight (rather than just levels 1-5 near Edgeville). This update would've been the opposite of that, so maybe those pkers didn't like the idea.
.
.
.
I'm GRATEFUL to this poll now, though. I now understand what Bounty Hunter is and how it works much better now. And I can confidently say that I LIKE BOUNTY HUNTER
It's only in one world and there's no non-bounty-hunter incentives to use the wilderness of that world, so only pkers should be in the wilderness in that world. BRILLIANT!
02-Mar-2017 11:24:03
Quick find code: 380-381-367-65887036 Back to Top