forums.rs

Forums

Dev blog: Trading Solution V2 Thread is locked

Quick find code: 380-381-34-65435513

of 100
Tchervychek

Tchervychek

Posts: 21 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Big rofl at everyone voting yes on Question 5 but voting no on Question 4. Seriously, why folks?
Or am I missing something?

Also, if we aren't able to sell our e.g. Nature runes while we are on e.g. DKs, is there even a point of such system? Why would you even go to that place to set up an offer if you can simply use *****?

post scriptum:
I saw few people saying something with hacking going on on *****. Please, explain how will you get hacked by giving out your display name?
You probably meant DDOSing, as one's IP is shown to the website moderators.

EDIT: ***** = The One Website

29-May-2014 15:24:11 - Last edited on 29-May-2014 15:32:10 by Tchervychek

Gad Zook

Gad Zook

Posts: 1,883 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I've never had any issues with zbz security. What I've heard is from people who have redirects that they're blaming on zbz possibly because they don't understand how viruses work on your computer.

But the point of having an in-game version is that instead of a page full of stale offers you can see what's being offered by players who are actually online. This virtually eliminates the need for zbz except players might still try to use the price guide part.

29-May-2014 15:49:18

Ere 90
Mar Member 2014

Ere 90

Posts: 430 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
based on the results i deduce that people have misread some of the questions. the results at this point are in favor of having a trading post that is essentially the G.
E. ...one of the main reasons i play this game is because it doesn't have the G.E. and is not what i consider to be broken. its to my understanding that allot of the old community hated the G.E. as well. based on this i believe that a secondary vote should be held with more viable questions that are worded better.


-Sincerely,
An oldschool player

Agreed

29-May-2014 15:57:18

Gad Zook

Gad Zook

Posts: 1,883 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
based on the results i deduce that people have misread some of the questions. the results at this point are in favor of having a trading post that is essentially the G.
E. ...one of the main reasons i play this game is because it doesn't have the G.E. and is not what i consider to be broken. its to my understanding that allot of the old community hated the G.E. as well. based on this i believe that a secondary vote should be held with more viable questions that are worded better.


-Sincerely,
An oldschool player

Agreed

Again, the poll results so far (with over 15k votes tallied) show the trading post being a forum for advertising what you want to sell but NOT completing trades for you.

29-May-2014 16:11:14

nvrgitbk

nvrgitbk

Posts: 57 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I just want to say that this osrs community is so freaking stupid! People have voted in favor of questions 5 and 6, but not question 4???? The only way the system can even be used for 5 and 6 is for there to be a yes vote on question 4!!!! You people are soo dumbbb!!! What is the logic for voting no to question 4, and then saying yes to 5 and 6, which require a yes for 4 to even work??? What kind of freaking sense does that even make?!?!?!?!!? Nice job on voting no for offline exchanging, btw.

29-May-2014 16:24:01

nvrgitbk

nvrgitbk

Posts: 57 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I hope Jagex takes into account the voters for 5 and 6 in deciding whether 4 passes because obviously a lot of people arent smart enough to realize the link between those questions. its close enough to 75% anyway sooo...Such a dumb community

29-May-2014 16:31:11

Shiroyasha

Shiroyasha

Posts: 112 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
reading through these comments about question number 4 not getting voted in is making me laugh, i thought i was the only 1 that realized that every1 seemed like they misread question number 4 but voted number 5 and 6 in anyways. i think there should be a re-vote option for those who don't read anything before clicking yes or no.

29-May-2014 16:35:26

Quick find code: 380-381-34-65435513 Back to Top