forums.rs

Forums

Dev Blog: Raids Rewards

Quick find code: 380-381-339-65846170

of 37
Mr-Wildstar

Mr-Wildstar

Posts: 753 Gold Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
@ Royy

I was thinking of an attack speed on a wiki. Sorry for confusing that part.

But if the Claws are as fast as a d scimitar...Then it will be OP AF. It's a stright upgrade to the AGS and it will be used WAY MORE for PJING, Rushing, etc...

30-Oct-2016 02:46:47 - Last edited on 30-Oct-2016 02:57:12 by Mr-Wildstar

Legolas
Dec Member 2010

Legolas

Posts: 2,158 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Mr-Wildstar said :
@ Royy

I was thinking of an attack speed on a wiki. Sorry for confusing that part.

But of the Claws are as fast as a d scimitar...Then it will be OP AF. It's a stright upgrade to the AGS and it will be used WAY MORE for PJING, Rushing, etc...

All good mate. It was just easier to grab the big quote than just pick his apart. I was more telling the original guy that. :P

Yeah, the wiki is backwards. I've tried to get them to change it for awhile but it's a "major task". (Well gee, if you hadn't f-'ed it up in the first place, it wouldn't be now would it?)

Dragon Claws have ALWAYS been speed 4. All claws are speed 4. We don't have all the crazy boosting gear and prayers we had back in the Pre-EoC days. Their max on old school is 84 (42-21-11-10) and max accuracy in that same gear is only +87.

They also can't be 1-ticked like the AGS. Honestly, had the roles been reversed, and we had Claws now and AGS was being polled, it would never pass. Nope.

30-Oct-2016 02:50:19 - Last edited on 30-Oct-2016 02:51:35 by Legolas

lol at kids
Oct Member 2019

lol at kids

Posts: 3,623 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I was going off the wiki so that's why I said correct me if I'm wrong I was only going off the information I had, where can I see the official speed chart, because I was going off wiki which is apparently wrong, correct; and to whoever said the speed does not affect the claws; I've had countless hours of pking most of my nearly 90m str xp back in the day was from pvp, so I'm no stranger if they were slow as battleaxe not only would it affect them it would make them trash tier and definitely not worth using as your +1.

30-Oct-2016 03:32:23

Taank

Taank

Posts: 138 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
my thoughts: this is oldschool runescape not a repeat of rs3 this is your chance to not just do the same things that rs3 did and to make up your own things stop doing things that rs3 did, make something original dont call them dragon claws call them abyssal claws or the claws of the name of the boss or whatever and make them 70 attack required, do somthing diffrent from rs3 for a change.

30-Oct-2016 04:06:25

Snormie

Snormie

Posts: 885 Gold Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Legolas said :
Snormie said :
Dragon Claws -

Everyone take a step back and think about pre-eoc for a minute...

Let me go ahead and stop you there. We do not have:

Turmoil
Overloads/Extremes
Tokhar-Kal
Saradomin's Whisper (+12 strength)
Torva (Higher strength than ours).

All those made claws the deadly weapon they were. Here? Nah, it's really not OP at all.

ROFL!!! You have no dang clue..

When jagex opens those 2 deadman worlds where you can pick any gear you want in clan wars and just fight people, they added D claws and it was a complete mess. Everyone used claws, and everyone just facerolled with their damage, all they had to do was do a decent hit with archer and then d claw spec once and you were dead.

At first I never used the claws and kept using dhroaks and ags and stuff.. then I switched to d claws and I would get kills against tanks, against mages by rushing them in 2 specs, and my kill count sky rocketed.. I nearly never died because it was stupidly easy to kill people with d claw spec.

You have no clue what is to come if they pass.. I guarantee it will ruin pvp. #noskill pvpscape

That also means pures will be able to fight higher levels now a lot easier, especially if you are 1 def and maxed all combat skills.. those guys are deadly

30-Oct-2016 04:07:01 - Last edited on 30-Oct-2016 04:10:36 by Snormie

Snormie

Snormie

Posts: 885 Gold Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Legolas said :
Mr-Wildstar said :
@ Royy

I was thinking of an attack speed on a wiki. Sorry for confusing that part.

But of the Claws are as fast as a d scimitar...Then it will be OP AF. It's a stright upgrade to the AGS and it will be used WAY MORE for PJING, Rushing, etc...

All good mate. It was just easier to grab the big quote than just pick his apart. I was more telling the original guy that. :P

Yeah, the wiki is backwards. I've tried to get them to change it for awhile but it's a "major task". (Well gee, if you hadn't f-'ed it up in the first place, it wouldn't be now would it?)

Dragon Claws have ALWAYS been speed 4. All claws are speed 4. We don't have all the crazy boosting gear and prayers we had back in the Pre-EoC days. Their max on old school is 84 (42-21-11-10) and max accuracy in that same gear is only +87.

They also can't be 1-ticked like the AGS. Honestly, had the roles been reversed, and we had Claws now and AGS was being polled, it would never pass.

All I know is... 99 attk str and 1 def pure's rekt everyone with claws, so you are saying they are bad I personally think you didn't use them right. THEY were the most complained about weapon back in the day for a reason!

30-Oct-2016 04:13:18

lol at kids
Oct Member 2019

lol at kids

Posts: 3,623 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I would say korasai was much more controversial IMO; a magic based attack that had a relatively high hit; best part was 240k risk if I remember right; it got to the point where in edge people wouldn't risk fight without praying mage during the fight; I think all of you lack experience in pking back then if you must argue between eachother, honestly No one but a VERY little minority care about the pure community; they are definitely not what makes osrs float; and should not even be considered to be balanced around IMO; I had a max range tank and max main pk'd on both back in day this time I only have time for one and made a zerk for something different. So this is a purely non biased opinion.

30-Oct-2016 04:19:03

Snormie

Snormie

Posts: 885 Gold Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Legolas said :
Numbers + experience tell me otherwise.

Still voting yes on both of my accounts.

Ok, I promise babe I have a lot more experience in pvp than you will ever have, or ever dream of. I don't talk based on numbers, I talk based on facts and actual personal usage my self.

You wait and see. The special last time I knew also increases the accuracy so at 90 attack+ you can hit even on tanks very decently.

30-Oct-2016 04:22:48 - Last edited on 30-Oct-2016 04:23:12 by Snormie

Legolas
Dec Member 2010

Legolas

Posts: 2,158 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Snormie said :
Legolas said :
Numbers + experience tell me otherwise.

Still voting yes on both of my accounts.

Ok, I promise babe I have a lot more experience in pvp than you will ever have, or ever dream of. I don't talk based on numbers, I talk based on facts and actual personal usage my self.

You wait and see. The special last time I knew also increases the accuracy so at 90 attack+ you can hit even on tanks very decently.

I honestly don't care if you have experience in the wild. I've used them on here and on RS2, and I got several of them as drops. Used them everywhere in the game.

I'm not worried, and I liked the weapon. Therefor, I'm voting yes.

Go ahead and vote no, that's the beauty of a polling system. Telling me you "have more experience" than I do isn't going to sway my opinion, lol. Nope.

30-Oct-2016 04:35:59

Quick find code: 380-381-339-65846170 Back to Top