forums.rs

Forums

Dev Blog: LootShare

Quick find code: 380-381-274-65760320

of 23
epiclegacy77

epiclegacy77

Posts: 532 Steel Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
We will be polling LootShare on Monday so be sure to give this blog a read!

this is where you failed jagex.

what you did wrong is you did read through your responses and feedback and made a revised blog which was correct, but then you messed up thinking you would just poll it without further feedback and revising till you can see in comments it is mostly agreed upon therefore it is then time to poll it, not directly after you revise it some.

04-Mar-2016 19:36:14

epiclegacy77

epiclegacy77

Posts: 532 Steel Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
2007saa said :
THE ONLY REASON A LOT OF US WANTED LOOTSHARE WAS FOR THE POOLED DAMAGE

TOO MANY TIMES CAN 1 MAXED PERSON CRASH A 20+ PERSON MASS

VOTING NO

NO MORE CONTENT THAT WILL ONLY BENEFIT ENDGAME PLAYERS

this is why rs3 crashed because there wasnt a fair and realistic normal competition.

it got to easy fake gameplay which made it unrealistic and unrelatebale which inturn created massive bulk entries of items and goods which crashed economies for those who could control it and also drove down prices because it was to manipulated.

04-Mar-2016 19:40:44

RAIDEN_1

RAIDEN_1

Posts: 886 Gold Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
"This change to how kills are awarded for LootShare means that solo players will still be able to compete with teams. It also means there is no need for designated LootShare worlds."

Can you please explain how it will work if one team is in a world and a solo player crashes or competes, that means the solo player can crash easy. That leads me to the conclusion, what is the point of a team then if someone can crash?

04-Mar-2016 19:49:03

Avid Sparx

Avid Sparx

Posts: 28,124 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
The loot share now offered, giving a random chance to all members of a team, is acceptable.

Thanks for polling the exploitable LSP system separately. The simple, random, LootShare described here is fine...I feel okay voting yes to it. The LSP though, gets a big ole' noe. 'Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.'
T. Pratchett, 1948-2015 RIP, you are missed

04-Mar-2016 20:25:39

Great Dragon

Great Dragon

Posts: 2,967 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
when someone gets a high valued loot, split all high valued loots into "onyx (e) bolts which every person recieves a fair share of?

they high alch for 9k each, and wouldnt crash the value of items. They would just make people in the economy richer, and that my friends, is fair. taxes for the church, taxes for the mayor taxes for the sherrif, taxes for the king... its a wonder there is anything left to eat,
does it look like i've struck gold here?

04-Mar-2016 21:00:43

Great Dragon

Great Dragon

Posts: 2,967 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
IM VOTING NO ON ALL LOOTSHARE UNTIL YOU GUYS GIVE US COINSHARE IT PASSED WITH OVER 50% IN THE POLL AND YOU "CLAIM" IT NEEDS 75% TO PASS???? UNFAIR. taxes for the church, taxes for the mayor taxes for the sherrif, taxes for the king... its a wonder there is anything left to eat,
does it look like i've struck gold here?

04-Mar-2016 21:01:28

Crazy M-Fr
Feb Member 2012

Crazy M-Fr

Posts: 2,734 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I cant believe you idiots are still doing an "either-or" situation with lootshare and coinshare. It shouldnt be that hard to set up a system where everything can be used as an option: like offering both lootshare and coinshare, and letting the group decide which they want to use. If they dont want to use it, then they turn it off, if they do then they turn it on and choose which mode to put it in. Its not that hard to do...

Im pretty sure a lot of people were scared that they would be forced to choose between the two. If you make the system an option, there shouldnt be as much confusion and negativity. As for those players who vote no regardless, you guys are ruining the osrs community; just add lootshare and the coinshare you mentioned and let players decide if they want to use it or not...

btw this 75% poll requirement is rediculous... you're letting a small minority of players choose whether something should go in game or not. make it 2/3 votes to make things fairer jagex, and stop letting the bottom half control the content.

04-Mar-2016 21:25:27

Crazy M-Fr
Feb Member 2012

Crazy M-Fr

Posts: 2,734 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Great Dragon i totally agree. 75% to get something passed is rediculous; it basically allows a small minority of players to control whether something gets passed or not. It doesnt represent the majority of osrs players, and is making the game worse.

PLEASE, JAGEX, LOWER THE REQUIREMENTS TO 2/3'S AT MOST! 75% is just plain stupid...

04-Mar-2016 21:28:26

epiclegacy77

epiclegacy77

Posts: 532 Steel Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Crazy M-Fr said :
Great Dragon i totally agree. 75% to get something passed is rediculous; it basically allows a small minority of players to control whether something gets passed or not. It doesnt represent the majority of osrs players, and is making the game worse.

PLEASE, JAGEX, LOWER THE REQUIREMENTS TO 2/3'S AT MOST! 75% is just plain stupid...

50/50 is huge opposition and at 66/100 is still major opposition, this is half of the agreeing percentage arguing which is still major disagreement so therefore its 75% because at this much, its way more in favor of who wants it and also this much agreeance would influence most of the oppossition to agree.

04-Mar-2016 21:34:34

Quick find code: 380-381-274-65760320 Back to Top