Forums

Dev Blog: LootShare

Quick find code: 380-381-274-65760320

Luffy6
Nov Member 2014

Luffy6

Posts: 667 Steel Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Dear everyone voting,

here is a few variables you are not considering. Firstly is those of you saying you would not vote for it is completely illogical other than the fact for spite possibly. They are specifically adding the option where team damage is not pooled, the only difference between this situation and what is currently in game is that now you will be in a clan chat getting randomized drops rather than pvming casually. Everyone soloing will not be affected what so ever. Another point is that regardless of how much you want to argue that loot share was not old school you are actually very wrong. Loot share was released in October 2007. Now I understand everyone is entitled to their own opinions and I completely respect all of you who said they would vote no, but this seriously makes it harder for this game to devolop(not to rs3) but into a deeper game that offers us the option to pvm with other people without the risk of scamming. I have played since 2007 and not having to trust someone that you met at 3 in the morning in a clan chat is so much easier than having to do so. As for the argument that a trust worthy person should trust another person is bogus. There are a lot of kids on here who are immature and are ready to logout upon drop, that's how it is with anything that involves monetary value on this earth.(not the log out part though lol)

As for you guys deliberately arguing the similarity to rs3, just think for a second. Harder bosses that need loot share means harder to recieve an item that may be released that is powerful because of the ability to camp where as bosses released with the possibility for soloing instead of team means easier kills therefore more drops. Compare armadyl and zulrah.

Final note is: drops and new items are going to be released as this or any game progresses, would you rather be in surplus or on occasion?

I believe lsp is a great idea ,only if you can see it and not anyone else. stops getting kicked from teams

04-Mar-2016 16:57:16

Luffy6
Nov Member 2014

Luffy6

Posts: 667 Steel Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Luffy6 said :
Dear everyone voting,

here is a few variables you are not considering. Firstly is those of you saying you would not vote for it is completely illogical other than the fact for spite possibly. They are specifically adding the option where team damage is not pooled, the only difference between this situation and what is currently in game is that now you will be in a clan chat getting randomized drops rather than pvming casually. Everyone soloing will not be affected what so ever. Another point is that regardless of how much you want to argue that loot share was not old school you are actually very wrong. Loot share was released in October 2007. Now I understand everyone is entitled to their own opinions and I completely respect all of you who said they would vote no, but this seriously makes it harder for this game to devolop(not to rs3) but into a deeper game that offers us the option to pvm with other people without the risk of scamming. I have played since 2007 and not having to trust someone that you met at 3 in the morning in a clan chat is so much easier than having to do so. As for the argument that a trust worthy person should trust another person is bogus. There are a lot of kids on here who are immature and are ready to logout upon drop, that's how it is with anything that involves monetary value on this earth.(not the log out part though lol)

As for you guys deliberately arguing the similarity to rs3, just think for a second. Harder bosses that need loot share means harder to recieve an item that may be released that is powerful because of the ability to camp. Where as bosses released with the possibility for soloing instead of team means easier kills therefore more drops. Compare armadyl and zulrah.

Final note is: drops and new items are going to be released as this or any game progresses, would you rather be in surplus or on occasion?

I believe lsp is a great idea ,only if you can see it

04-Mar-2016 17:01:37

Aka ElyGrind

Aka ElyGrind

Posts: 7 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Plz dont do that to ironmans!!!!!

ok, a solo normal account will have a chance to compete with teams... but and ironmans?
Without designed worlds for lootshare will be impossible for ironmans to find empty worlds!

I will vote no just cause of that, wanna solve the problem? give ironmans instances for boss, or instances for teams.

04-Mar-2016 17:10:08

ImReloading
Feb Member 2024

ImReloading

Posts: 260 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
@I AKAGAMI I craziest thing i have ever heard u are voting no because iron men do not have instances? lootshare will not just make people pop up into the game the worlds will be no more crowded then they already are i dont understand ur logic

04-Mar-2016 17:23:17 - Last edited on 04-Mar-2016 17:24:17 by ImReloading

ImReloading
Feb Member 2024

ImReloading

Posts: 260 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I dont understand why you guys are doing this without the whole teams damage being accounted for the fun of 4 people doing bandos together should surpass the one ****head who's crashing them. please just poll instantshare you never have and i think it would do better if people stopped thinking it would effect them so much it would actually make the game better like it did when it was previously added clans would be better bossing would be funnier and more people would enjoy the game

04-Mar-2016 17:28:09 - Last edited on 04-Mar-2016 17:30:14 by ImReloading

Jesica

Jesica

Posts: 272 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
"While this could be fairer in principle, there were a few drawbacks, notably the way a player might rack up a lot of LSP in a relatively safe place"


comon ronan, you beleive w/e your fanboys says?

1. you cannot earn lsp in solo.
2. to rack up the lsp you have to always miss the drops. which is impossible, because once your lsp went close to lsp leader, u will start to get drops and loose lsp.

you made 2nd question by your favor, people going to vote no to it because u said its unfair in blog itself.

people will not do lootshare with question 1. who will want to camp boss and miss drops in return gains nothing not even lsp? and some lucky guy comes in and gets the sigil over others who camping for days.

so 2nd question must pass otherwise lootshare will be just dead content if question 1 passes.

04-Mar-2016 17:30:49 - Last edited on 04-Mar-2016 17:45:30 by Jesica

ImReloading
Feb Member 2024

ImReloading

Posts: 260 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
You are correct @Jynx this does not stop "scammers" if you are trying to split the ls'ed item but this does at least give you something out of it. I do think that something like instantshare would be better coinshare without ruining the economy but they decided to not poll it for some reason.

04-Mar-2016 17:32:40

Quick find code: 380-381-274-65760320 Back to Top