forums.rs

Forums

Dev Blog: Near Miss Poll

Quick find code: 380-381-150-65567074

of 24
dunforgiven

dunforgiven

Posts: 102,158 Ruby Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
why aren't you polling the off line portion of the ge. it failed to pass with the tp, so it should be polled to add it to the ge. frankly my dear, I couldn't give a dam. never had a river to build one on.
veteran of 4 runescapes

06-Feb-2015 21:18:51

Jjozzie
Jun Member 2005

Jjozzie

Posts: 1,643 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Teliriah said :
Jjozzie said :

Soundscape said :
Honestly I'd like to see the Wilderness ditch stay... it's something that adds to the nostalgia... :(

No, the ditch not being there would be more nostalgic.


The wilderness ditch was only there to prevent lurers and scamming. as for more nostalgia being there, that's wrong.

Classic Runescape never had a wilderness ditch. That is all.

Unless you're talking about the post I quoted, you have just copied exactly what I have said lol.

06-Feb-2015 21:19:15

dunforgiven

dunforgiven

Posts: 102,158 Ruby Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Kilot said :
Avid Sparx said :
Kilot said :
flamebait

Der*, I don't get lured...noobs do though...

...you want them to quit their first week or so, because they get lured...and find out JaGex DOES NOTHING ABOUT IT?

Kid, think.

If there smart they won't get lured. Luring works on how greedy the player is.

trade lures have nothing to do with how greedy the victim is. how many thousand of times do you have to have the trade lures explained to you before you understand they are not avarice (greed) lures.

because of lies people like you spread, I will be voting against it. frankly my dear, I couldn't give a dam. never had a river to build one on.
veteran of 4 runescapes

06-Feb-2015 21:25:36 - Last edited on 06-Feb-2015 21:26:58 by dunforgiven

Agi911
Dec Member 2009

Agi911

Posts: 1,161 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
You're missing a really important one!
Super antifire potion failed as a secondary item reward from nmz at 74%
I think this should be polled to be added as the original way to make them using the desert pheonix's feathers making untradable versions

06-Feb-2015 21:35:24

Agi911
Dec Member 2009

Agi911

Posts: 1,161 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
dunforgiven said :
why aren't you polling the off line portion of the ge. it failed to pass with the tp, so it should be polled to add it to the ge*
** passed as all the functions that came with it. That means yes to offline trading.
The trading post is not the grand exchange.
It would be like suggesting rs3 remove the trading post. Can't happen as the trading post has nothing to do with rs3 and soon nothing to do with oldschool.

06-Feb-2015 21:41:57

LV2

LV2

Posts: 1,660 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Mod Ronan said :
Slay Helm said :
Where's the Onyx Ring (i)? :O

We weren't entirely sure on the specifics of how the onyx ring (i) would work as we were considering giving it a little something extra based on yesterday's livestream (hiding your minimap dot). We'd rather hold off on offering it and come up with a more fleshed out idea of what it could do (IF we end up polling it).

Thought I'd mention Onyx (i) should have nothing to do with the ring of stone - as they are essentially different items the same way a recoil ring and a sapphire ring are.

06-Feb-2015 22:21:25

Quick find code: 380-381-150-65567074 Back to Top