Forums

F2P Discussion

Quick find code: 380-381-144-65560976

Przc

Przc

Posts: 83 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Never saw so stupid decisions to get this OSRS more popular. (Oh sorry, I saw once, eoc, no wildy, bonds, trade limit and other BS. - It was your job, right?)
Looks like Runescape management staff had problems even with finishing high schools so I am not surprised of this BS suggestions coming more and more.

1. You increased membership price ? - Usually lower price is more attractive to people, especially to newbies. You do opposite, it will reduce of chance getting new players into the game and also has a chance of forcing old/veteran players to leave this game.

2. You want to grow this game, but don't want to open f2p? F2p is best way to attract new players into the game - more new players - more chance to get new members. So it means - thats you who need F2P, if you want to see this game growing.

3. Bonds? That means only one - 99 lvl will be worth nothing. Old players will start leaving this game sooner or later, because any rich kid will be able to get huge starting gp so easy.

So, by doing all this steps, in my opinion, you have only one main purpose: You are excpecting/forcing this project, by name " OSRS - Runescape 2007 ", will be end/closed soon (in like 1-2 years), or simply merged with rs3, and thats why you are aiming to suck-out as much money as possible from current players .

26-Jan-2015 20:03:15

Lewis Shoot
Oct Member 2005

Lewis Shoot

Posts: 3,825 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Mickezy said :
Bonds are a good money sink, I guess. And since you basically concluded that more players will come and stay for the long term, i'll vote yes. But if that predicament doesn't come true, the community will have to say "you were wrong."

Why do you think bonds are a money sink?
The ingame gold will transfer from once account to another, no gold is being taken out of the economy at all.

All this does is give players an official way to buy gold ingame, currently if you buy gold ingame it's against the rules and rightfully so. However jagex are failing to enforce any punishment against it because they're gaining members (and therefore money) from it.
And this is why they want to introduce it with f2p, there will be a rise in players on osrs and more will be able to get and sustain membership.
Also they're worried players will cancel their membership, but I can't see why because most people are at a point ingame where they need membership to progress any further.

The bottom line is F2P will make osrs grow.
Jagex want more money, and bonds will get more money for them.
So if they make osrs grow & introduce bonds it'll be very profitable for them.
RIP Forums :(
Finally we have signatures in the surprise forum update. I'm Lewis, I play Old School & I've been playing since 2005.

26-Jan-2015 20:10:29

Lol im easy9
Mar Member 2024

Lol im easy9

Posts: 23 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Damn it who cares about bonds? aslong as we can have Perm f2p for pking, revive multi pking, clan wars mini game F2P war in wilderness, pking noobs in wilderness, mage pure at lev 13s owning ppl, i dont mind about bonds so id vote yes! bring back Perm f2p

26-Jan-2015 20:24:47

No GF onlyRS

No GF onlyRS

Posts: 47 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Lewis Shoot said :
Mickezy said :
Bonds are a good money sink, I guess. And since you basically concluded that more players will come and stay for the long term, i'll vote yes. But if that predicament doesn't come true, the community will have to say "you were wrong."

Why do you think bonds are a money sink?
The ingame gold will transfer from once account to another, no gold is being taken out of the economy at all.

All this does is give players an official way to buy gold ingame, currently if you buy gold ingame it's against the rules and rightfully so. However jagex are failing to enforce any punishment against it because they're gaining members (and therefore money) from it.
And this is why they want to introduce it with f2p, there will be a rise in players on osrs and more will be able to get and sustain membership.
Also they're worried players will cancel their membership, but I can't see why because most people are at a point ingame where they need membership to progress any further.

The bottom line is F2P will make osrs grow.
Jagex want more money, and bonds will get more money for them.
So if they make osrs grow & introduce bonds it'll be very profitable for them.


Because you have to pay 10% of its cost to make it tradeable, thus removing that much gold from the game.
you should learn how things work before criticizing that they don't

26-Jan-2015 20:25:04 - Last edited on 26-Jan-2015 20:37:03 by No GF onlyRS

Sassycindy

Sassycindy

Posts: 98 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
you know I believe that if the question was polled as..

do you vote in favor of osrs bonds...the majority would probably vote a resounding NO

however that isn't the question...

knowing that the demand is popular for f2p permanently

it is wrong to use the temptation of perm f2p just to get bonds voted in...

that's called manipulation and almost a kind of bribery..

IF YOU WANT F2P then we have to have bonds.....
that's wrong..

also you just are raising our membership so why isn't that enough?

you are forcing us to vote for bonds because you know everyone wants f2p.....not cool

also we think we are getting what we want in this game.
.but in reality the master plans seems to be to re poll everything until it eventually passes.....
again...not cool

none of this crap was supposed to ever enter our game.

.are we gonna buckle under because we want f2p?

26-Jan-2015 20:42:47

yoqurt
Nov Member 2022

yoqurt

Posts: 2,159 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Rae of Light said :
"Squeal of Fortune, Solomons Store, Treasure Hunter, Runecoins or any other sort of micro-transaction will not come to Old School unless you vote for it in a poll."

...That sentence went on about 8 words too many :@


If 75% or more of the community wants it, and it's not a bananas idea (like giving everybody max cash), the idea is to let the community have it. However, I highly doubt the community will ever want this, unless of course they offer to remove membership fees and replace said fees with MTX.

26-Jan-2015 20:57:32

Alpha Trion

Alpha Trion

Posts: 2,483 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Sassycindy said :
you know I believe that if the question was polled as..

do you vote in favor of osrs bonds...the majority would probably vote a resounding NO

however that isn't the question...

knowing that the demand is popular for f2p permanently

it is wrong to use the temptation of perm f2p just to get bonds voted in...

that's called manipulation and almost a kind of bribery..

IF YOU WANT F2P then we have to have bonds.....
that's wrong..

also you just are raising our membership so why isn't that enough?

you are forcing us to vote for bonds because you know everyone wants f2p.....not cool

also we think we are getting what we want in this game.
.but in reality the master plans seems to be to re poll everything until it eventually passes.....
again...not cool

none of this crap was supposed to ever enter our game.

.are we gonna buckle under because we want f2p?


+1

26-Jan-2015 21:19:03

Ice Tea Plz

Ice Tea Plz

Posts: 1,379 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
People already buy bonds in rs3 sell the bonds for gp then transfer the gp from rs3 to old school. all this does is eliminate one step I dont understand why some people get so huffy puffy about pay to win when you can already do it.


As long as this is the only type of micro-transaction that ever comes to this game im fine with it seeing as people already do it anyways.

26-Jan-2015 21:42:50

Quick find code: 380-381-144-65560976 Back to Top