RuneScape Forum Archive | F2P Discussion

Mar

2024

Gabe X

Posts: 130 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile

"These people who started once again in 2014, 2015 have no idea how exactly this will affect the economy... And vote Yes"

This will effect the economy in a very positive way, just like it did in RS3. They have already proven the method works guys, and quite well @ that.

26-Jan-2015 13:51:57

Sep

2019

Celine Lion

Posts: 11 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile

A lot of people would really appreciate old school Runescape free to play, I think you guys underestimate the numbers when it comes to how many people would actually switch over to old school if it became free to play (potential Membership Buyers included), the numbers would increase if anything, most places I go in RS3, I almost always end up having a conversation about old school, everyone benefits from it, everybody loves it, also saw some people wanting the old school membership charge rates returned £3.20 so that they are paying for old school membership by itself and not paying for RS3 membership, Could you make this possible? Thanks for reading.

26-Jan-2015 13:52:17

Urdead4200

Posts: 225 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile

are you serious right now i thought this is osrs you need to seriously slow your roll and stop with the bs. f2p sure but bonds lmfao ... ill quit on the spot just like rs3 if this bs happens and play xbox. you guys are so greedy on money u cant get enough money from the membership ^ so now bonds are up for debate even b4 ge is in and only days after you say the price its going to its laughable absolutely ridicules

26-Jan-2015 13:55:51

Apr

2014

TomNumbers

Posts: 2,650 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile

Yes please, poll this ASAP. It's healthy for the game (provided you didn't manipulate your figures) and it's amazing that swapping fcs are no longer required.

One big sidenote:
Please stick to the "bonds-for-membership" stance you have now. We don't want Salomon's or Treasure Hunter in the game.

26-Jan-2015 13:57:00

Sep

2013

Temper Metal

Posts: 32 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile

I agree with f2p for oldschool and bonds but no! soloman's store and Squeal of Fortune/treasuer hunter becuse those kinda made it a little to easy for people with irl cash to get good gear if your lucky and the cosmetics would confuse people.

1. yes on f2p and bonds
2. no on soloman's store and Squeal of Fortune/treasuer hunter

26-Jan-2015 13:59:34

Aug

2013

Heritage

Posts: 14,598 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile

TomNumbers said :
Yes please, poll this ASAP. It's healthy for the game (provided you didn't manipulate your figures) and it's amazing that swapping fcs are no longer required.

One big sidenote:
Please stick to the "bonds-for-membership" stance you have now. We don't want Salomon's or Treasure Hunter in the game.

Their figures are off, they claim the game is growing, but shows a graph that tells us otherwise, like what the hell lmfao..?

Legal gold buying is not healthy for the game, it devalues the game for others.

We don't want players to be able to buy their way to success in RuneScape. If we let players start doing this, it devalues RuneScape for others. We feel your status in real-life shouldn't affect your ability to be successful in RuneScape.

26-Jan-2015 14:04:26

Apr

2014

TomNumbers

Posts: 2,650 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile

Heritage said :
TomNumbers said :
Yes please, poll this ASAP. It's healthy for the game (provided you didn't manipulate your figures) and it's amazing that swapping fcs are no longer required.

One big sidenote:
Please stick to the "bonds-for-membership" stance you have now. We don't want Salomon's or Treasure Hunter in the game.

Their figures are off, they claim the game is growing, but shows a graph that tells us otherwise, like what the hell lmfao..?

Legal gold buying is not healthy for the game, it devalues the game for others.

We don't want players to be able to buy their way to success in RuneScape. If we let players start doing this, it devalues RuneScape for others. We feel your status in real-life shouldn't affect your ability to be successful in RuneScape.

Can you provide the source where they say the game is growing? Also, people can already buy RS3 bonds and swap the cash (most likely using their own ccs) to OSRS.

26-Jan-2015 14:14:56

Aug

2013

Heritage

Posts: 14,598 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile

They said it on Q/A streams and here on the forums, I won't be able to find it, I'm sure someone else has a source.

Yes, and that totally comes without risks. It's NOT a excuse to add them.

We don't want players to be able to buy their way to success in RuneScape. If we let players start doing this, it devalues RuneScape for others. We feel your status in real-life shouldn't affect your ability to be successful in RuneScape.

26-Jan-2015 14:18:01 - Last edited on 26-Jan-2015 14:18:15 by Heritage

kid-kiddy

Posts: 259 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile

2nd worst community i saw in my life in a mmor.p.g...

Common everyone don't be selfish, jealous and narrow-minded , Bonds is a really good idea !

*It's a way to support and help jagex that is in difficulty because all this f2p-shops mmor.p.g games that exist now

*It will also help players that can't afford a membership with real money.

*It will help peoples that work and don't have enough time to play enough to progress

*It will help to fight against gold sellers with their bots and their rs3/rs2 clans gold exchange.

I will VOTE YES even if i know i will never use it

So think good about it , don't be selfish/narrow-minded and vote only no because you don't use bonds , don't forget the other players !!!

26-Jan-2015 14:31:49

Jun

2023

Howey

Posts: 1,152 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile

Heritage said :
TomNumbers said :
Yes please, poll this ASAP. It's healthy for the game (provided you didn't manipulate your figures) and it's amazing that swapping fcs are no longer required.

One big sidenote:
Please stick to the "bonds-for-membership" stance you have now. We don't want Salomon's or Treasure Hunter in the game.

Their figures are off, they claim the game is growing, but shows a graph that tells us otherwise, like what the hell lmfao..?

Legal gold buying is not healthy for the game, it devalues the game for others.

We don't want players to be able to buy their way to success in RuneScape. If we let players start doing this, it devalues RuneScape for others. We feel your status in real-life shouldn't affect your ability to be successful in RuneScape.

This^^^^ is oldschool vote no for bonds.

¸•*’‘*·¸,,,,¸·’¯)

T

V

P

(¯‘·¸,,,,¸·*’‘*•¸
`.,¸¸,.·

Rüîñ åwaîtš Gïèleñór

·.,¸¸,.

26-Jan-2015 14:47:42

Forums

F2P Discussion