I really like the changes you guys did. Although I do not like your approach of not polling any of the updates. I thought that you guys
ALWAYS
would poll changes before they were implemented.
27-Nov-2014 15:33:55
- Last edited on
27-Nov-2014 15:34:24
by
Root Exp
Root Exp
said
:
I really like the changes you guys did. Although I do not like your approach of not polling any of the updates. I thought that you guys
ALWAYS
would poll changes before they were implemented.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
It wasn't a poll, it was a survey to find out how the players felt.
Will this justification be used to implement other changes in the future or is this a one time failure?
When it comes to game integrity issues it will yes.
Updates such as this one which protect the integrity of the game aren't ones that need to be polled.
Root Exp
said
:
I really like the changes you guys did. Although I do not like your approach of not polling any of the updates. I thought that you guys
ALWAYS
would poll changes before they were implemented.
I'm happy that the splashing issue was dealt, even when you completely ignored the results (54%<31% apparently) which I think wasn't fair for the people whose opinion was the majority. Who knows which poll/survey you'll ignore next?
Sorrow is the conduct to a void inside us.
27-Nov-2014 15:37:25
- Last edited on
27-Nov-2014 17:02:23
by
Claudark
Applejuiceaj
said
:
Root Exp
said
:
I really like the changes you guys did. Although I do not like your approach of not polling any of the updates. I thought that you guys
ALWAYS
would poll changes before they were implemented.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
It wasn't a poll, it was a survey to find out how the players felt.
Will this justification be used to implement other changes in the future or is this a one time failure?
When it comes to game integrity issues it will yes.
Updates such as this one which protect the integrity of the game aren't ones that need to be polled.
Oh, I must have missed that one.
27-Nov-2014 15:39:21
- Last edited on
27-Nov-2014 15:39:39
by
Root Exp
Applejuiceaj
said
:
Root Exp
said
:
I really like the changes you guys did. Although I do not like your approach of not polling any of the updates. I thought that you guys
ALWAYS
would poll changes before they were implemented.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
It wasn't a poll, it was a survey to find out how the players felt.
Will this justification be used to implement other changes in the future or is this a one time failure?
When it comes to game integrity issues it will yes.
Updates such as this one which protect the integrity of the game aren't ones that need to be polled.
You're treating the term like its some highly specialised knowledge, rather than just a value term, open to a lot of interpretation. 'Game Integrity' isn't some eternal law that game developers deal out from some lofty height. The very best you could do with a phrase like 'Game integrity' is insert some obvious values. Players being listened to is in my opinion an obvious value that constitutes a part of 'Game integrity'. The Old School team clearly have other ideas
27-Nov-2014 15:44:17
- Last edited on
27-Nov-2014 15:45:46
by
stukhotel
Big Churg
said
:
does this mean that people who work aroudn the half hour timer to not get kicked. aka gwd and pvp worlds and such will get banend for doing so?
The only way to get banned for AFKing is if you use a bot.