Forums

Dev Blog: Wilderness 2 Thread is locked

Quick find code: 380-381-12-65435469

Lmao Lal

Lmao Lal

Posts: 802 Gold Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
The Dark bow only required 60 ranged to use and was a drop from a lvl 90 slayer monster. So why not even the playing field with a Dragon staff! This could be dropped from the Kraken monster.

-
Dragon staff
: This staff allows an infinite amount of air and fire runes to be used.
-
Special attack
: Allows you to double hit with the spell you are using and increases the max hit of the spell you are using by 50 % and uses 60 % special attack bar.
-Examples: the fire blast hits a max of 16, the special attack would allow you to hit 24 twice!

The special attack only works with the elemental spells.

The lowest level pure could be 32 just like the lvl 32 d bowers with 10 hp! But lets face it, this dragon staff could be more powerful down the road just like the dark bow!
And here's how: with the formula i made for the damage that the special attack could do, depends on the 4 basic spells you can use, earth, water, fire, and air.

So later on when you get 75 magic for fire wave, your max hit is 20 and with the special attack, your new special attack max hit would be a possible 30-30.



^



I really like this idea, not only dose it allow mages to have a weapon with just as much impact as godswords and d bows...it gives the normal spellbook some power compared to ancients. Love it


With an addition of a seperate effect for each type of element
Water:
Additional +5 max damage, similar to ice spells being the strongest
Fire:
Burn ~ Similar to Poison
Earth:
Snare 10 seconds ~ Similar to Nature runes spells
Air:
Move opponent back 1 square & Stun ~ Similar to dragon spear effect

18-Jan-2014 14:16:13

Reminiscon

Reminiscon

Posts: 3,528 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
Question: Should we remove 10 worlds from the world list to boost activity on the other worlds?

Def no, better make 10 worlds to be able to use all those new future updates but def not removing 10... It will affect godwars, resources etc...


Lol? Back in real 2007 we had way, way more people per world than now... deal with it.
Long live the Wilderness. Long live risk vs reward in PVM. Long live 2006.

18-Jan-2014 14:18:07

Saxo
Mar Member 2020

Saxo

Posts: 7,687 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
It's up to the skillers how much pkers profit. They can bank whenever they want, the pker could get 1 red chin or 100k red chins. It's all up to how often the skiller banks, if you don't want pkers to profit easy then bank more often.

Can they profit from pking? yes, that's kind of the whole point of the update. Is it too easy? Depends on the skiller, but for the most part it won't be. No skiller is going to sit in the wild with 15k chins, they will bank every hour or so realistically.


Bah, that doesn't really matter, the Wildy will stay empty in those zones (chins/ents)


And the Pker profit doesn't have to depend on the skiller, look the effect of green d bots.
I mean, imagine bots camping those chin zones, a Pker go here and kill the bot, hop world, kill the bot, hop world kill the bot.
He can make like 10M/H, it's not how the game work.
Green dragon bots are a different ball game. Noone kills them because they'r enot profitable at all, and bones/hides just take up invent space which could be used for sharks o it's just pointless.


Ignoring the heavily exaggurated GP/hour... So instead of legit people making a posisble 10m/hour you would rather bots make 10m/hour? Either way.**** is still coming into the game, the only difference is what accounts it's going on.

How is this not how the game works?

18-Jan-2014 14:18:37 - Last edited on 18-Jan-2014 14:23:49 by Saxo

Reminiscon

Reminiscon

Posts: 3,528 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
This update is appropriate for 2013 runescape, not 2007. Why hasn't GE come out in 2007? Why haven't you focused on releasing OLD runescape updates instead of adding new material to the game which makes more players quit? Please for the love of God, STOP with the updates. They harm the game. Bring back 2007's roots and stop making the game easy to play for people who play it.

Also, I saw this question in this Dev Blog.

Question: Should we add three new rune rocks to the Ice Plateau?

Answer: Why would you? What does adding three new rune rocks to the game which have not been there before do to the game? It eliminates the "nostalgia" feel that players have had since they started playing 2007 runescape in Feb 2013.


This post makes no sense. Grand Exchange is NOT Old School at all. What's truly Old School is an active Wilderness. What's wrong with this community..
Long live the Wilderness. Long live risk vs reward in PVM. Long live 2006.

18-Jan-2014 14:19:38

Reminiscon

Reminiscon

Posts: 3,528 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
omg polllll old lesser + greater demon graphics please!!


and all other old graphic models!!

~CR0W
3 Word Game , Invasion , Necroancy and combat Pets , Barrows expansion , Snow Ball Arena , Lock Down Server(s) , The Trade Island by CR0W and McGee , Clan Update And Max Levels . ~/Sig


yessss


I support. Please poll old graphics for demons, dragons, etc.


THISSSSS

I paniced when i saw the old greater demon on the dev blog, so nice


What is it with you nostalgia freaks? Stop living in the past, this is a new Runescape game where we can have new stuff, most of us want HD graphics never mind ugly ass 2006 graphics!


Are you kidding me? HD Graphics are ugly; I want the old 2006 monster graphics back.
Long live the Wilderness. Long live risk vs reward in PVM. Long live 2006.

18-Jan-2014 14:22:14

Agaard

Agaard

Posts: 785 Gold Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
Green dragon bots are a different ball game. Noone kills them because they'r enot profitable at all, and bones/hides just take up invent space which could be used for sharks o it's just pointless.


Ignoring the heavily exaggurated GP/hour... So instead of legit people making a posisble 10m/hour you would rather bots make 10m/hour? Either way.**** is still coming into the game, the only difference is what accounts it's going on.


No, instead of legit people making a extremly high gp/h (and 10M/h is possible, even if exaggerated), i allow bots to do a normal gp/h. That's not mean i defend bots, but I'm against "Pking"(free killing) paradise.

18-Jan-2014 14:29:31

Reminiscon

Reminiscon

Posts: 3,528 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Here's a summary of ideas I find good regarding Lava Dragons:

1) Change the name of Red Dragon Isle to Lava Dragon Isle (This only makes sense).

2) Add a southern exit to Lava Dragon Isle that requires High level Agility.

3) Change the XP for the Lava Dragon Boones to 108XP, which is 1.5x what regular Dragon Bones give (remember people, Dagannoth Bones already exist and give 125XP each).

4) Instead of having them drop hides, have them drop "Lava Dragon Scale." This would be used on an Antifire Potion when grounded to turn it into a Super Antifire potion. This would require High level Herblore.

5) Replace the Green Dragons in level 35 Wilderness with the Red Dragons.
Long live the Wilderness. Long live risk vs reward in PVM. Long live 2006.

18-Jan-2014 14:30:00 - Last edited on 18-Jan-2014 14:30:38 by Reminiscon

Quick find code: 380-381-12-65435469 Back to Top