Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Limiting the worlds
Many of you have asked us to limit the amount of worlds available to Old School to boost activity on some of the quieter worlds. This is particularly relevant to the Wilderness as increasing activity there is a big aim.
Question: Should we remove 10 worlds from the world list to boost activity on the other worlds?
____________________________________
Remove the PvP Worlds
I agree. Get rid of PVP worlds AND remove 10 worlds. The wilderness will be much more active.
I support this. Remove PvP Worlds.
Long live the Wilderness. Long live risk vs reward in PVM. Long live 2006.
18-Jan-2014 02:00:55
- Last edited on
18-Jan-2014 02:01:16
by
Reminiscon
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Limiting the worlds
Many of you have asked us to limit the amount of worlds available to Old School to boost activity on some of the quieter worlds. This is particularly relevant to the Wilderness as increasing activity there is a big aim.
Question: Should we remove 10 worlds from the world list to boost activity on the other worlds?
____________________________________
Remove the PvP Worlds
I agree. Get rid of PVP worlds AND remove 10 worlds. The wilderness will be much more active.
If Green Dragons are going to remain a single-way combat zone, won't the looting bag become an issue? Is it possible to prevent storing Dragon Bones/Hides in it? (Assuming the Lava Dragon will have a different drop, so this won't hurt Lavas.)
i would like to see some of the old pk hot spots such as the dark warriors castle, varrock wildy area, and especially the mage arena area brought back to their former glory along with this wildy update or a future update.
my thought is instead of making high risk worlds like people have been asking for i suggest making these pk hot spots high risk areas where protect item cannot be used and all items will be dropped skulled or not.
i feel like this would not only bring the wildy back to life but also the old pk hot spots that people from the older pk days used to go to.
_______________________________________________
adding on to this idea i think a way to also combat bots with this update is make green dragon high risk areas as well.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Limiting the worlds
Many of you have asked us to limit the amount of worlds available to Old School to boost activity on some of the quieter worlds. This is particularly relevant to the Wilderness as increasing activity there is a big aim.
Question: Should we remove 10 worlds from the world list to boost activity on the other worlds?
____________________________________
Remove the PvP Worlds
I agree. Get rid of PVP worlds AND remove 10 worlds. The wilderness will be much more active.
I support this. Remove PvP Worlds.
YESSSS!!!! Remove them
SUPPORT! Please remove the PvP Worlds! The wilderness will become more populated just through this! (I would like to hear what any mods have to say about this)
18-Jan-2014 02:31:40
- Last edited on
18-Jan-2014 02:37:32
by
10bd
Why remove PvP worlds? Firstly, its only two worlds, and secondly, the wilderness still works in them...
If anything, PvP worlds would be more dangerous because of the different level bracket - you can attack anyone within (15 + level of wilderness) combat levels of you.