I think the far harder thing is to try and walk a path with a clear philosophical leaning, but not favoring a single god. What happens when you want to support multiple deities with similar philosophies, but as an ally or equal or mediator rather than a sycophant, shifty flatterer, or a schizophrenic?
Too often the dialogue choices are "I love you!," "I hate you!," "I'm the World Guardian and all gods are bad," and some flavor of "I'm a self centered prick."
Still, I think I've been making it work. I've supported Saradomin, Armadyl (less so outside of WE2 despite wanting to, he really needs a quest focused on him), Zaros, and the Guardians of Guthix (not so much the Godless proper) variously, while acting totally against Zamorak and Bandos. Even with the ones I like, I tell them off when I feel they're wrong (I wish there were more dialogue options that let me do this nicely though). The result is a kind of jumbled mess of characters being variously pleased and disappointed with me, but that makes sense. Ultimately, like any role-play, this requires you to try and re-contextualize the areas where the limitations of the game prevent you from expressing yourself 100% within its literal bounds.
The other reason Zamorak is going to be really hard is earlier quests. Back in the day your character did have a somewhat set characterization as an accidentally competent idiot, and even serious quests had a comedic tinge. Being able to truly choose was not part of the story. In addition, Zamorak was more of a cardboard cutout "bad guy," and so he and his followers made for easy villains. That said, it makes sense nonetheless to me; surely followers of chaos will be prone to plots to further their own power via disruptive means, as well as some degree of infighting.
03-Mar-2017 16:57:47