Historically, 1's military/army was a more visible function of power or might.
The US, China, and Russia have had the largest militaries in the modern world for much of the last 70 years.
England had the most powerful navy from the late 1500s to WW1 (approx)
Rome had the most powerful army in Europe and North Africa from the Punic Wars up until Rome's fall.
For many former or would be empires, military strength is 1 aspect of it.
Good, effective tactics and leadership is another.
The might of the US military (and NATO) has been undone not by traditional massive armies duking it out, or technology, but by smaller more determined forces who fight seasonal wars.
Rome was undone more by internal corruption and infighting before being overwhelmed.
Alexander the Great conquered a massive swath of territory before dying, and immediately his generals fought breaking up his 'empire'.
Zaros for a long time had the duality of a very very powerful army, followed by the best commanders he could find.
This allowed his empire to grow to an impressive size.
But, much like Rome, corruption took its toll. Then infighting.
Without Zaros, without unity (assuming Zamorak's little insurrection went faster or more smoothly and his demonic allies didn't just take him away that quickly, he might have been able to retain a better remnant of the empire) Zaros' kingdom fell apart, and everyone else sensed it and attacked.
06-Jun-2014 14:40:54