Forums

Past holiday items for sale

Quick find code: 309-310-198-66015241

Sharp-shin

Sharp-shin

Posts: 41,301 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Pikachu78 said :
if that were true the the poll would of failed, but it didn't , the poll was a simple question "do you want to buy items from solmons for loyalty points" and more people said yes then no thus the poll passed, don't know why you say otherwise as there was no percent requirement like in oras to pass meaning people don't want them discontinued anymore, further proof is all the complaints on here about not getting the proper items for clearing the past events during the 2016 xmas event that really upset people that they couldn't get the items for doing the event that rewards it. also there is no problem with releasing the items into the store as you arnt getting the actual item just a cosmetic copy of it which does no harm

The loyalty point poll would've failed with the better balanced 75% threshold, and the OSRS poll for untradeable discontinued items would've actually passed had the poll been an actual poll and not a poll for gathering information only (and tradeable discontinued items were extremely close to passing technically as well). The latter is also much more up-to-date than the loyalty point poll.

And where is the "further proof"? If people were really that upset back then, why doesn't anybody talk about it anymore except for you in this thread? When some major backlash occurs in the game, people will still talk about it years later, but you can literally never hear people talk about the 2016 xmas event these days because people didn't actually care and the amount of people who were upset were quite small.
"Volat Accipiter libera est; venandi sua natura est."
~Accipiter striatus

24-Jun-2019 03:52:12

Draco Burnz
Dec Member 2011

Draco Burnz

Posts: 79,296 Emerald Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Pikachu78 said :
not necessary cause people forget no matter how big the blacklash, also your wrong the poll would of still passed ,most people don't want them discontinued I don't see why you fail to see this


No ppl didnt want them to return otherwise they wouldve happened.

Seems like its you whos failing to understand anything.
Draco Burnz
Anime Fanatic
Defender of the logical

24-Jun-2019 11:27:28

Draco Burnz
Dec Member 2011

Draco Burnz

Posts: 79,296 Emerald Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Sharp-shin said :
And where is the "further proof"? If people were really that upset back then, why doesn't anybody talk about it anymore except for you in this thread? When some major backlash occurs in the game, people will still talk about it years later, but you can literally never hear people talk about the 2016 xmas event these days because people didn't actually care and the amount of people who were upset were quite small.


Agreed.

He thinks theres like thousands of ppl wanting this when its all in his mind.
Draco Burnz
Anime Fanatic
Defender of the logical

24-Jun-2019 11:28:36 - Last edited on 24-Jun-2019 11:28:45 by Draco Burnz

Whatusaytome
Apr Member 2020

Whatusaytome

Posts: 5,767 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile


There were 25000+ extra players who voted support on the poll. Whether or not that's 75%, that is a highly significant amount of excess.

Blackwing can stubbornly say it's not 75% but I don't think that matters. My point is 10000 people can vote on something and 7500 can say yes more easily than if 100000 voted. but when over 100000 vote, it matters more that it passes at all.

Just ask America to vote for a president. Put a 75% threshold on that candidacy vote. See how that works. Lmfao.

You deny people cosmetics because of a passing vote not meeting an unlisted standard. And don't have any reason to say no, other than "I want to prove I was there", which has already been solved.
Your opinions here can affect us all. Please post for the better

Stepping Stone Partyhats
Update the rules , Trade Lock Scammers

24-Jun-2019 20:21:06 - Last edited on 24-Jun-2019 21:38:34 by Whatusaytome

Sharp-shin

Sharp-shin

Posts: 41,301 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Pikachu78 said :
not necessary cause people forget no matter how big the blacklash

Mhm, which is why people have also forgotten about such backlashes as EoC and MTX, the two of which are much older (2012) than the 2016 xmas event?

...nevermind, people still regularly complain about them to this day. When people truly care about something, they won't forget about it. Hence why those two are still remembered to this day, while the backlash you claimed to have happened is nowhere else to be found but here, in this thread only.


Pikachu78 said :
also your wrong the poll would of still passed ,most people don't want them discontinued I don't see why you fail to see this

You don't seem to understand that when someone has no personal reason to vote against something, then they're going to vote yes, especially if the game is basically telling them "want more stuff available to you? yes/no". People who voted against had reason to do it to protect what they cared about, which made Jagex realize that when the "majority" for yes wasn't clear-cut like it would be for an OSRS poll to pass, it'd still piss off more people than what it would offer to others.

Frankly, it worries me that if Jagex did a poll on something that would actually affect the game balance, and after polling it successfully realized that it'd be a detriment to the game e.g. by causing a major spike in inflation, that someone like you would tell Jagex not to revert the poll's outcome just because the poll already happened. It should go without saying that common sense is more important to listen to (hence why Jagex ignores polls on OSRS when game integrity is at risk) than a poll that could easily be flawed in a way that you don't yourself realize. At least if you don't wish to upset more people than who would truly care about e.g. getting their hands on some outdated cosmetics.
"Volat Accipiter libera est; venandi sua natura est."
~Accipiter striatus

24-Jun-2019 21:12:38 - Last edited on 24-Jun-2019 21:13:54 by Sharp-shin

Whatusaytome
Apr Member 2020

Whatusaytome

Posts: 5,767 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
You'd get over this happening too, Blackwing.

People who voted against it, were under the impression it would be the exact same thing, preventing their "historical value" that you seem to think is being affected. Now that it has been discussed in detail, It isn't affected one bit. So get over it.

There's what other reason to say no? Can you respond to me Blackwing? or are you just going to remain an ignorant coward?
Your opinions here can affect us all. Please post for the better

Stepping Stone Partyhats
Update the rules , Trade Lock Scammers

24-Jun-2019 21:37:27

Whatusaytome
Apr Member 2020

Whatusaytome

Posts: 5,767 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
What's been explained though? Everything Blackwing says is either extremely personal or is so unspecific that it doesn't matter whether they released them or not.

There's no logically explained reason why this is something to avoid, rather than some few people saying they don't think it should happen.

Even if you say it has been explained, you certainly won't bring it to the front where we can see it.

If Jagex wants to make their poll even more specific for passing, they should have placed the limitations, such as only 75%+ is a pass, in the poll's question. Or something like polls getting over 100k votes get a different curve, as it's less likely to pass a 75% regardless of the poll.

Some things need clarification FIRST, before they can be used as a later excuse for something not happening.

This was a 2014 poll. They didn't make the specifications you guys are using. So you are wrong. And it did pass.
Your opinions here can affect us all. Please post for the better

Stepping Stone Partyhats
Update the rules , Trade Lock Scammers

24-Jun-2019 22:47:35

Quick find code: 309-310-198-66015241 Back to Top