forums.rs

Forums

Content Poll - Prestige

Quick find code: 294-295-289-65183445

of 138
Songs

Songs

Posts: 669 Steel Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Voss said :
Vote no ppl....seems rahl is just alot of hot air right now....i think he's said all he deems important for prestige....anyhoo....vote no ppl....vote no
ppl will vote "no" if they want too.
its not right to try and tell them what to vote.

17-Oct-2013 22:25:16

Heidly Ees
Jun Member 2023

Heidly Ees

Posts: 5,484 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I voted yes.. I don't have any 99's and am not concerned with getting them. I just don't see the problem with this system. It's your own achievements at the end of the day.

To those saying it promotes unhealthy gameplay.. lol. Like getting even 13 mill xp in a single skill was healthy to begin with. I've played for nigh on 5 years. I play for fun, not xp. I'm just a man; I'm not a hero.
Just a boy who had to sing this song.

17-Oct-2013 22:26:47 - Last edited on 17-Oct-2013 22:26:56 by Heidly Ees

Lotuspod

Lotuspod

Posts: 248 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
1st Sea Lord said :
I voted no. Thanks for actually caring about what we think. You should do that more often, honestly. People who have played the game 1000's of hours have a pretty good idea of why that did it, what was fun, and what is garbage.

Yes if they did that we wouldn't have eoc, bonds, rs3, or a ton of other things that are making the game much more interesting atm.

17-Oct-2013 22:30:10

Se7en of 9

Se7en of 9

Posts: 437 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Mod Mark, if you are reading this I want you to know I love the idea of the Prestige system and really hope it goes through. I see nothing but benefit to the players in the set up.

I know you and others must have worked really hard on the development, and I appreciate all of your effort. I would truly hate to see all of that work go to waste.

I, of course, voted "yes" and will be encouraging all of my friends to do likewise. :)

17-Oct-2013 22:30:39

B I L L Y
Nov Member 2011

B I L L Y

Posts: 3,054 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
i voted no for 2 reasons

1 i don't want my xp past 99 to have bin a waste its just my op please don't rage me

2 i don't think its right that the new hi scores would be the default hi scores and the old ones pushed aside

sorry if you wonted this but everyone should vote how they fee

17-Oct-2013 22:32:47

Jellyman Fin
Jul Member 2023

Jellyman Fin

Posts: 1,291 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
[quote id=294-295-289-65183445-159-328173610][b]“[/b][tan] I would think it would be better to cap the levels' potential multipliers (How well defense defends in combat, strength increases damage, prayer lasts, etc.) at 99 and then allow the level to exceed past 99 superficially. That or show the level 99 cap with a parenthesized prestige level next to it, such as 99 (107) and you could even allow the possibility of short-term boosting from your prestige level. Another option, similar to the previous, is adding a parenthesized prestige level addition as 99 (+8) instead of 99 (107). Then features, such as quick chat, could exclaim "I am currently level 99 magic and I have 8 prestige levels." or something along that effect. [/quote] i have also thought about this in the past as a good way for higher levels to progress but without it affecting gameplay a great deal. I voted yes on prestige, and would also vote yes on a system like this too.

17-Oct-2013 22:33:51

Quick find code: 294-295-289-65183445 Back to Top