forums.rs

Forums

BTS 58 More Lodestones

Quick find code: 294-295-213-65136655

of 61
yammaniow
Mar Member 2007

yammaniow

Posts: 1,828 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
rather than introduce "lazy sedate things" why not inrtroduce a world for peng hunters where u dont get mauled by PK morons who camp at the likely spots?
I get really fed up of having to run to say the lava maze 10 times to find 1 peng!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I know what I want to do, but can rarely achieve it

22-Jun-2013 11:49:46

Rex Caeli

Rex Caeli

Posts: 268 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
First moment in a very long time that i think that i don't like an upcoming update... Lodestones are convenient, but at the same time they lower the value of quests. Why bother unlocking fairy rings, since you will be able to go almost anywhere with lodestones? I'm sure that you can counter the potential loss of amulet and ticket teleports by improving the location a bit, but that won't work for fairy rings i think... Anyway, maybe i'll hold on until i see the lodestones in action. Then i'll be able to give a better judgement :)

Rex. Completionist cape owner as of 14/10/2015 :)
Master quest cape owner as of 25/12/2015 :)

22-Jun-2013 11:50:24

Nant

Nant

Posts: 2,669 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
As everyone else has already said, we don't need more lodestones, we'd prefer less, just to give Law Runes a use.

On the other hand, why didn't you just create what's left to be made for lodestones.

Either Morton/Burgh De Rott (I mean, if we're going to make elven crystals redundant, why not the Games Necklace teleport redundant) or Darkmeyre?

Mos Le'Harmless

Ape Atoll

Shilo Village

All I can think of at the moment, just some ideas there, seeing as other methods of teleporting are now redundant. :)

22-Jun-2013 12:07:57

Dojan

Dojan

Posts: 229 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I don't really like this update, but I don't dislike it either. It would, in my opinion, be better if all the lodestones had requirements, such as quests, tasks and other things. for example: Lumbridge and Burthope would have no requirements, while Taverly requires you to complete the Let them eat pie quest. Isafdar requires you to complete Roving Elves, a much higher requirement.

22-Jun-2013 13:29:41

Shark Toilet
Mar Member 2021

Shark Toilet

Posts: 402 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
I don't really like this update, but I don't dislike it either. It would, in my opinion, be better if all the lodestones had requirements, such as quests, tasks and other things. for example: Lumbridge and Burthope would have no requirements, while Taverly requires you to complete the Let them eat pie quest. Isafdar requires you to complete Roving Elves, a much higher requirement.

I presume the Isafdar Lodestone requires an Elven quest (like you said probably Roving Elves), the Oo'glog requires As a First Resort....

As for others, surprise us. When in doubt, snark at Mahjarrat.

22-Jun-2013 14:14:51

Alpha Trion

Alpha Trion

Posts: 2,483 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Quote: "Their doing this because more and more people will buy the Lodestone Special Effects now that your going to be using this transport casually. This update allows them to pickpocket our real life money."

Well said sir, this is exactly why they are doing it. Instead of having microtransaction updates every hour, they should really have them every 10 minutes, and then remind us of them every 5 minutes in game. It should be one long spam fest of messages in our chatbox all day long.

Don't forget, members get 2 spins instead of 1!
Don't forget, members get 2 spins instead of 1!

*gunshot heard*

22-Jun-2013 14:31:22

Quick find code: 294-295-213-65136655 Back to Top