As most people on the forums are aware, people have been requesting 2004-2008 servers a while now, even before Evolution of combat, but making a 2007 server and splitting the community is just insane, I can even understand to a degree if the servers are fully funded by the people who want them, but why do the rest of us have to pay the price because they can't learn to adjust?
If this poll is anything like the return of the wildy and free trade poll, it will be rigged more than a Blue Peter competition, meaning that it will likely have a largish team of devs maintaining the servers, has it really come to this? Have WE really got to listen to the people that want to stop the game progressing? Like said by Mod Mod Mark, if you don't like change why play a game that updates so frequently?
I've played RuneScape since late 2004 and I tried RSC a bit, I've enjoyed pretty much all the time I spent playing RS2, and even the trade limit (which I hated at the time), had it's advantages which I didn't fully appreciate at the time, aka the massive reduction of gold farmers.
If people truly do care about RuneScape please act rationally when voting, Do you want to try and re-live memories that are long gone? Or take part in experiencing one of the most updated MMORPG games and all it has to offer?
I don't think what I say will change anyone's mind that is dead set on getting 2007 servers, but at the very least I can give a somewhat counter argument, the all those who are saying it's amazing on personal *accounts/memories not facts
*not as in RuneScape account, accounts as an event or experience
~ Also a Honorable mention, I believe a while back you yourself said Mod MMG that the reason that RuneScape for console may not be possible is it could split the community, this is exactly what 2007 servers will do, so does this mean we're more likely to see RuneScape for Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo consoles/handhelds? ~
13-Feb-2013 22:12:35
- Last edited on
13-Feb-2013 22:15:04
by
Marky