RuneScape Forum Archive

Keighlea

Posts: 40,455 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile

Blasty said :
testing testing

Original message details are unavailable.
testing

testing

Test much?

Edit: I got distracted by Blasty's testing so forgot to reply to you Indy lol. That's well understood, and spoilers have never worked for me either. That's the best people have managed on the normal forums, so without a spoiler tag at all that would still be the best people can do

The censor and tag thing (and disappearing tags) are a bit inconvenient, but hopefully some time in the future we can find a solution for those

Thanks for your prompt reply, as always!

-slides another coffee your way-

Oh, and you didn't have to reply to me so quickly either, whether Joe bribed you with coffee or not

The Purple Sorceress

Lady of Zaros

Proud Linkify user - Become one of the Family!

09-Jul-2014 23:55:43 - Last edited on 09-Jul-2014 23:59:06 by Keighlea

Keighlea

Posts: 40,455 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile

I hate to bring this image thing back up again too, but I just noticed this post...

Seeker said :
Hevilmystic said :
HTTP://i.imgur.com/bP5mNt0.png

ssdgsgerhrtehrt.
Hey this looks familiar

If you click the image (single left click) it opens in a new tab and focuses on that tab. Is that the intended behavior for a quoted image? Or is it supposed to open in a light box thing?

The Purple Sorceress

Lady of Zaros

Proud Linkify user - Become one of the Family!

10-Jul-2014 00:02:22

Indecent Act

Posts: 7,456 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile

^ I might try text spoilers and make them work only on this thread for testing purposes, but I got loads of stuff to do before I even think about doing that.

Hmmm, Looking at Blasty's tests, I expect him to post about anchors opening in new tab.

Edit: The image thing...

Notice the original source of that post does the same. Spoilers don't use lightbox, it's not the fact it's quoted. I did mention a list of limitations when I first did it and I can't remember if I mentioned that (I think I did though).

Anyway the version I'm currently using has some changes and spoilers use the lightbox.

But this version I'm still testing and I won't push out an update until after the weekend, so it'll be a few days before you see the changes.

I'd like to push it out now, but I really need to thoroughly test some other things I've changed (new safety features, making linkify co-exist better with other extentions, lightbox improvements, custom title changes, and more), before I do any updates.

10-Jul-2014 00:03:15 - Last edited on 11-Jul-2014 04:34:41 by Indecent Act

Feb

2017

Blasty

Posts: 9,319 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile

I was looking for alternative ways to store linkify tag data in a post but it didn't go anywhere.

I thought about nesting blank i/b/u/s tags and although that would never get censored, it would take a lot of characters and not be invisible to non-linkify users. The same would apply to blank colour tags.

I thought about storing the tag positions in the qfc tag where nothing gets censored, but that could break with the forum update, and might use more characters and depending on how it's done, might look weird for non-linkify users.

I can't think of any other way to have custom tags that never get censored :/

Whitespace characters take up the least characters and are invisible to non-linkify users which makes them perfect... when the censor doesn't mess with them

i

Blasty

// @BlastytheBlue // Blasty#5167

| Co-owner of Mine Nation

10-Jul-2014 01:19:40

Indecent Act

Posts: 7,456 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile

^Ah I see...

I wrote a simple function some time ago that would convert digits 0-9 to invisible unicode characters and back again.

I planned on using it for all my custom tags since the combinations are basically limitless and decoding is lightening fast. The only thing stopped me using it is the censor

Edit: Thanks for your time with that other thing I mentioned

10-Jul-2014 01:35:46 - Last edited on 11-Jul-2014 04:34:22 by Indecent Act

Feb

2017