Forums

Wildy/Free Trade referendum... Thread is locked

Quick find code: 254-255-50-62065672

asdad2323

asdad2323

Posts: 276 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I can easily say the majority of old players want the old wildy back. The new players obviously don't want the old wildy back because.. they've been too protected, babied. They'd go bat-**** insane if they ever got piled by 50 dotters or had to stand there screaming SELLING ABBY WHIP 2M over and over again for half an hour.

28-Dec-2010 20:22:05

Runningfores

Runningfores

Posts: 2 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I want this game back as it used to be.
This is the reason why I stopped. If things will return back to normal I'd definatly come back.
____________________________________________________________
........'Vote........¸‹•*'°'*•¸
¸•*ˆ*-¸.¸‹•*°¨°*•›¸........¸'
ˆ‹,¸¸¸,›°¸..Yes!'...`¬-•°
.............°‹„¸¸¸„‹•*°*•›¸

28-Dec-2010 21:15:33

Iron 1965
Feb Member 2018

Iron 1965

Posts: 248 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
In response to Hersir Sah
Still can not figure out why pvp is not good enough for you to fight other players that want to fight other players.
As for making wildy wild. Then there should be substantially more revs there and the possiblity of revs hunting in groups.
If it was for making wildy wild there are many other possible solutions than pking.
It still seems like the main focus for those that want "old wildy" back is to kill players that are not interested in fighting other players....
Yea, you will not get the stuff the other person is carrying on pvp worlds today, but it that is the only reason you want old wildy back, why not ask for that being fixed on the pvp worlds?

28-Dec-2010 21:37:27

0Tahki0

0Tahki0

Posts: 639 Steel Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
@Emybaba, You're failing to see my point so as you said earlier we have to agree to disagree..
@1quilla1, I do understand that the game has changed but a majority of the players like the way it was over how it is now because the content is much less risky. I also never said that I wouldn't want revenants to remain so to make that assumption is folly on your part. If anything I think that along with pkers there should be more high lvl mobs running around to make up for the pkers that hardly go through most worlds.

28-Dec-2010 21:38:33

Vaballa9008

Vaballa9008

Posts: 83 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
As a member of the RS community for over 8 years, I can say that, in my opinion, gameplay decreased dramatically in quality upon the implementation of the trade limits. I never was a big fan of wildy PKing, but it was always a very interesting facet of the game that required strategy and planning.
As for the cheating concern, I don't think it'll make things dramatically worse. For one thing, most bots now are skill bots, which still gain the cheater money via the GE with or without trade limits. As for the GE/current price listing, I'd suggest something like listing the average price and maybe one standard deviation in both directions to take the place of the upper and lower limits.
One major issue that I think this will really help is item values. As it stands now, there are numerous items that have had their values drastically overinflated due to their use as "junk" trade items to get a transaction within the trade limit. Take, for example, Dharok's Helmet. It's steadily been rising in price from less than 1M all the way up to the 7M it stands at today; a rise which has more to do with its use as "junk" than actual demand for the item.
The way I see it, this can only help the game. It will bring back the influence of supply and demand, and certain overpriced "junk" items will become cheaper and more available for everyone.
My gameplay time has dropped off over the past few years, and I must say that this is the proposition I've been hoping and waiting to see. Thank you to everyone who created/signed the original petition, thank you to all the Mods/Admins who listened, and thank you to everyone who's voted yes.

28-Dec-2010 21:45:11

Iron 1965
Feb Member 2018

Iron 1965

Posts: 248 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I read in some previous posts that it would not be a good idea to have non pk worlds....
Why? If 90% of the community want to have pk, those safe worlds would be empty? Or populated by the very few people like myself that voted no.
Let us have the revs in those worlds.
Why would the safe worlds be overcrowded if everyone wants to pk?
Or is it that you who voted yes would choose the safe worlds also, but why?
If the safe worlds would be overcrowded, then the vote is bogus because there is less than 10% that voted no....

28-Dec-2010 21:57:30

Quick find code: 254-255-50-62065672 Back to Top