First, the "well informed" remark was ironic, implying that someone who calls them Jadex is not really into deep policy question thinking, but since he's so polite, now I feel guilty for being a bit petty.
As to the claim that macroers (I assume "botter" would be synonymous) have no relevance to the subject at hand: TBH, it's hard to take anything else a person that would make such a claim says seriously.
How many times on this thread have people said "Botters have always been here; they always will, so they're irrelevant."
Can we just settle this once and for all? (no, of course not; but lets make the attempt...)
In real life:
Criminals have always existed so why not do something that UNQUESTIONABLY provides incentive to commit crime? Police and politicians always claim they're going to increase enforcement, so why not make everyone do business in cash, so we'll all have lots of cash on us when we go walking around at night? Why not build a halfway house for *** offenders next to an elementary school? Lets encourage bunko artists to go into elder financial counselling when they get out of jail.
Now would you supporters PLEASE give this specious argument a rest?
29-Dec-2010 03:39:00