Forums

Wilderness and Free Trade Vote Thread is locked

Quick find code: 254-255-49-62042278

if end
Dec Member 2022

if end

Posts: 132 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',
Hello Jagex,
I do not want to old wilderness back.
The following reasons why:
- Clue scrolls in wilderness = EXTREMELY HARD
Aren't revenants enough danger in the wilderness?
- Wilderness Stars = EXTREMELY HARD
Same as Clue scrolls.
- Green Dragons = No more people at green dragons, ONLY the pkers that can afford to stay in battle.
No old wilderness. That is why we have Bounty Hunter worlds.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Free trade - I am 50% on free trade, because sometimes you want to give something out to a friend that is more than your trade limit.
Reason not for Free Trade:
- Scammers = WAY MORE
Scammers will be happy because you have added free trade.
Scammer 1:W00T, TY Jagex. Time to scam.
Scammer 2:R0FL, I scammed you 10m! Hahaha! N00B!
Even if they are reported, there will be too many scammers to mute or ban them all.
*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*
I SAY N0 TO THIS! THIS IS ALSO UNFAIR! PEOPLE CAN VOTE ON SEVERAL ACCOUNTS MAKING IT HARDER TO BOYCOTT!!!
AT LEAST MAKE IT ONE VOTE PER IP ADDRESS.
If over 1,000,000 votes are submitted "Yes", and Runescape then sucks balls because people are ruining wilderness and so many people are scamming, then I will then forth quit Runescape.
JAGeX, why take it away in the first place? Just because you want popularity doesn't mean you have to go *@#!ing Runescape.
@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!@!
***JAGEX, DO YOU REALLY WANT TO GET POPULARITY SO BADLY THAT YOU WILL RUIN RS SO THAT IT SUCKS BALLS?***

21-Dec-2010 20:21:41

ChaosDF

ChaosDF

Posts: 232 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
JOY TO THE WORLD****'ING IS COMING BACK
I CAAAAAANT FREAKING WAAAAAAIT
I'M GONNA HAVE MORE FUU-uu-UUN
WHEN THE TRADING CAP IS GOOO-oo-OONE
I DONT CARE ABOUT RWT TOO
AND BE HONEST, REALLY, DO YOU?
SO GRAB YOUR DDS AND MEET ME AT..... THE... ZAMMY....
MAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGE!
Merry Xmas one and all :)

21-Dec-2010 20:22:07

JWalls1082
Nov Member 2023

JWalls1082

Posts: 15 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Reset the "vote" and give us the right to say no! Many people are being wrongly voted for because our votes aren't protected. I like my game better without the bots and scammers, but I don't get a vote for that. I call bs.

21-Dec-2010 20:22:11

Cristi553

Cristi553

Posts: 1 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I agree with free trade, but i do not totally agree with the Old Wilderness. Maybe you can just have it in some special worlds rather than all of them. What everyone wants is the old wildy and if we do get it back why not in just certain worlds? Its still granting the wish for a majority im guessing. But the other minority or majority (depends on how many people are in favor of or *ot) doesn't have to go into the PvP wilderness if they do not wish. Thank you

21-Dec-2010 20:22:23

Alioth
Apr Member 2011

Alioth

Posts: 3,303 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
±‡±•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•±‡±•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•±‡±
I vote for Mod Mark's team and himself to resign, if you agree, please copy and paste this in your post.
±‡±•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•±‡±•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•¤•±‡±
A
lio
h
,
Of
S
iriu
s
R
isin
g
...

21-Dec-2010 20:22:31

TheWickedSon

TheWickedSon

Posts: 883 Gold Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
in the hype of it al i voted yes, but now thinking more clearly i regret my decssion.
bringing back the wild and free trade to the way it was will lead to major problems, but i can see some compromisses being made.
wild-
only certain worlds should have an active wild again, the rest can stick with reverents

trade-
one of two things should be done.
either remove the limit all togeather but still keep the price check down at the bottom of the trade.
or just expand the trade limit more.
i am really upset with how trade is going now becasue of the whole junk system and i really feel that, that should be taken care of also.

21-Dec-2010 20:22:36

Xiahou Cow
Dec Member 2007

Xiahou Cow

Posts: 3,281 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
MMH seems to be responding to many of the concerns facing this vote.
But the biggest concern yet to be acknowledged is that a small number of players can manipulate this vote since only usernames are needed.
Let's say 100 players use the high-scores to enter random names. Each of those players does one name every ten seconds. That's 100 names every ten seconds, obviously.
Or 600 every minute.
Or 36,000 every hour.
Or 864,000 every day.
And that's just from 100 players partaking in the manipulation.
I understand that this is a "genuine who wants/who doesn't want" vote, but the ability to manipulate it is absurd.
**This whole thing sounds more like a quick way to estimate the total number of players and/or accounts.**
Love Clan Wars? Join the community! Events Sundays, 7pm Eastern - World 302 Clan Wars!

21-Dec-2010 20:22:42

Uune

Uune

Posts: 1,805 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
You can vote more than ocne with the same name ?
I'm starting to lose my sense of reality.
Losing my sense of balance ...
Maybe I'll take a nap and wake up tomorrow and it'll all turn out to be one big joke ...

21-Dec-2010 20:22:44

Ladyofhonor
Jan Member 2017

Ladyofhonor

Posts: 2,863 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Kinky Fuzz, sadly no Jmod seems to be present anymore. Adding another vote at this point means absolutely nothing anyway. If you wanted to vote no you have no option to do so. If you wanted to vote yes, no worries thousands of people are already using your name and/or just voting without a name.
The point is it doesn't matter what the update will consist of. We were given no details or choices. They gave us a rigged "vote" and said we had a say, we don't.

21-Dec-2010 20:23:23 - Last edited on 21-Dec-2010 20:24:29 by Ladyofhonor

Quick find code: 254-255-49-62042278 Back to Top