I personally don't PK at all, and I never have, but I am in favour of the old wilderness. It was frustrating getting pked while abyss runecrafting or doing a clue, but the wilderness was a true PvP environment and I certainly respect that and agree with the sentiment of the wilderness.
However, free trade or unlimited trade will certainly exacerbate real world trading. It wasn't really a huge problem in the classic days or even in early RS2 as there wasn't this mad obsession with getting items or creating these characters so people can use them without having to spend hours training.
From around 2005 or so, bots became prevalent and up until 2007 it was impossible for free players to gather raw materials effectively at all, even partially for members as well. All these materials were being botted up the wahzoo with sometimes 30 or more bots on a single yew tree.
Buying items in game for real money was a serious problem, and free trade had to be taken away, and I believe that there should be a trade limit.
The wilderness can be considered a method of free trading though, as a bot can simply go to the wilderness with 50k yew logs (for instance) and get the real worth trader (buyer) to simply kill them and take the loot. For this reason, I am obliged to resist both the free trade and wilderness reintroductions as per above.
Now, I do understand that there are many botters on Runescape even now. Some of these bots are real world trading bots (as I'm sure the green dragon and red chinchompa bots are) but many are for personal use only to simply save time training because a player is just too lazy or impatient to do the work themselves. Back in the golden age of botting, these bots were ALL for making illegitimate REAL money against the rules of Runescape. The problem was in orders of magnitude worse than the botting problem today.
In summary
-FAVOUR of the "old" wilderness
-OPPOSE free trade
therefore
-OPPOSE the proposed changes
-Adam
05-Jan-2011 22:13:44