Forums

Another Topic: Standardization

Quick find code: 237-238-284-65784904

Role-Player
Nov Member 2023

Role-Player

Posts: 9,114 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I think the only form of standardization we need is rules for how invasions work.

Standardization for the other stuff would be nice, but I dunno if it would work. I'll keep reading ideas here before I make up my mind.
„¬°´˜“
And my sax.
“˜`°¬„

29-Apr-2016 14:47:11

Lady Airlea
Mar Member 2011

Lady Airlea

Posts: 5,379 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
jagkilledme said :
The sense of fantasy never disappeared. The main setting is fantasy. There's a literal war between gods being waged, but you don't see kingdoms taking sides. You don't see recruitment drives or meetings about it. Because that plotline doesn't interest most people on W42, so they don't acknowledge it, even though it's a part of canon. Our canon deviated from main canon years ago, and it's probably never getting back on track, because people don't want it to be.


Just not looking in the right places, to be honest. Other than my 14 year old squire causing problems in the bar, most of my RP is focused around God Wars stuff lately.
ª*
The One True Nat
ª*

29-Apr-2016 14:50:45

Spartae

Spartae

Posts: 5,624 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
It's also a bit of an outdated example, but I think back to the use of Rubium in W42's history. Generally, all people knew was "water + rubium = boom". So we had rubium use on the scale from damaging personal weaponry that was explosively tipped to castle-wrecking doomsday devices, and often with different ideas of how powerful x amount of rubium was.

Rubium was a source of fairly constant arguing - both how it was obtained and how it could be used. This is one of those things that I'd thought, "What if we'd had a standardized "rule book" on how different resources/materials work?"

Just another topic for thought since that one bears credence to W42's history in practice.

29-Apr-2016 15:55:01

jagkilledme

jagkilledme

Posts: 534 Steel Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Spartae said :
It's also a bit of an outdated example, but I think back to the use of Rubium in W42's history. Generally, all people knew was "water + rubium = boom". So we had rubium use on the scale from damaging personal weaponry that was explosively tipped to castle-wrecking doomsday devices, and often with different ideas of how powerful x amount of rubium was.

Rubium was a source of fairly constant arguing - both how it was obtained and how it could be used. This is one of those things that I'd thought, "What if we'd had a standardized "rule book" on how different resources/materials work?"

Just another topic for thought since that one bears credence to W42's history in practice.


A 2 second google search would disprove that, and I argued against it at a length, but no one gave a **** because it was such an efficient weapon and logic and lore ruined their pretend time. It was mentioned in the books, which I quoted. Didn't make a difference.
I am going to break your arm so that the bone juts out and then I will stab you to death with your own insides. I will win this chess game, is what I am saying.

29-Apr-2016 16:09:47

Circe
Apr Member 2013

Circe

Posts: 2,587 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
jagkilledme said :
Spartae said :
It's also a bit of an outdated example, but I think back to the use of Rubium in W42's history. Generally, all people knew was "water + rubium = boom". So we had rubium use on the scale from damaging personal weaponry that was explosively tipped to castle-wrecking doomsday devices, and often with different ideas of how powerful x amount of rubium was.

Rubium was a source of fairly constant arguing - both how it was obtained and how it could be used. This is one of those things that I'd thought, "What if we'd had a standardized "rule book" on how different resources/materials work?"

Just another topic for thought since that one bears credence to W42's history in practice.


A 2 second google search would disprove that, and I argued against it at a length, but no one gave a **** because it was such an efficient weapon and logic and lore ruined their pretend time. It was mentioned in the books, which I quoted. Didn't make a difference.


On the topic of Rubium, we've only ever really seen it used as a weapon in the form of the grenades that Ezekial uses in the Salt in the Wound quest. These exploded on contact after being thrown by Ezekial. Given the character model, they're around half the size of a child's four square ball and there seems to be only one solution contained within the grenade (no separation of rubium/water, based on the character model).

This along with Super Fishing Explosives suggest that direct contact of rubium/water is not explosive, but instead has an explosive effect when subject to outside force (think nitroglycerin).

As such, shooting it from a cannon would likely just cause the cannon itself to explode, but lobbing it as a grenade as shown in the two instances within lore would be feasible.

29-Apr-2016 16:21:45 - Last edited on 29-Apr-2016 16:23:02 by Circe

Siberys

Siberys

Posts: 4,893 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Right, back to the debating forum. (Zrie, friend, I'll reply to your posts after this!)

Going to address some of the specifics in your posts, Lor, before the main part of the message.

jagkilledme said :
I see a lot of what people propose as standardization in the same light as I regard the Mahjarrat division theory: it's largely stupid, has no foundation in the lore, a lot of gaps, a lot of things that would go AGAINST the lore quite blatantly and would be too complicated to set up properly.


... Uh? Resolving disputes before they occur seems rather lacking of stupidity, much of the propositions for standardization have nothing to do with contradicting the lore, there don't seem to be that many gaps, and I've already outlined a simplistic system for setting it up. The only thing I would see as remotely contradicting the lore would be standardizing what already exists as a 'lorebreak' (POK invasions, for instance).

jagkilledme said :
I just don't get it. Maybe I'm just getting older, but it doesn't click to me. I don't understand. Why is there a need for standardization? It's because people can't take five minutes out of their days to actually communicate with each-other and agree on something, because most people still aren't adult enough to do it.


An unfortunate truth. Standardization wouldn't be necessary, if not for all the issues that arise in the community. Alas, this is far from Utopia.

(cont.)
"Legacy. What is a legacy? It's planting seeds in a garden you never get to see."

Siberys | W42 RP'er |
Praise Madoka.

29-Apr-2016 16:49:44

Siberys

Siberys

Posts: 4,893 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
jagkilledme said :
I'll always run with JaGeX canon and fill in gaps. If you just did that, you wouldn't need standardization at all. Just logic and ideas. But it's contrary to what people do these days. Because timeskips. Because whatever.


As I've outlined, most of what I've proposed is for logic. The reason it's being proposed is people seem to have disagreements on that. :|

jagkilledme said :
I'm going on 24 in a couple of months and I sign onto the RS forums because RS is a game I enjoy, with lore I find rad, and I find out that people are suggesting an internet police about online pretend time. The idea is so laughable that I'm going back to bed after this farming run. The worst part about it is how people don't realize how ridiculous it is.

People that break rules already punish themselves by way of isolation. No one wants to play with them, because they're being that one guy in the playground that decides that you should say * next while you're playing pretend. No one liked that person as a kid. No one likes them now.

So why have a 'community police', which is an awful lot like telling people to say y next? 'Cause power. Which looks an awful lot like how it is with POCs and that one kid we all hated, and still do.


As 'people' is plural, I'm assuming that's partly directed at me. Like I've said, I don't want there to be a punishment system, unless it is 100% necessary - which I really hope it isn't. As has also already been stated, nobody is advocating isolation either - on the contrary, I'd like for the community to be more close-knit. If you meant the idea of standardization in general, nobody is doing this for power. It's intended as a community initiative, and the community would decide on the issues.

(cont.)
"Legacy. What is a legacy? It's planting seeds in a garden you never get to see."

Siberys | W42 RP'er |
Praise Madoka.

29-Apr-2016 17:05:30

Siberys

Siberys

Posts: 4,893 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
jagkilledme said :
Because of that foundation, it's now difficult to get into W42's roleplay. If you're new, you know all the RS lore and you're like "RAD" and you jump in to a new gaming experience, you realize that you know nothing, all of a sudden. All that history you've come to learn, irrelevant, no longer applicable.

If you leave for a couple months, so much as has happened and there have been so many timeskips that you're now lost. Your best friend is 75 and you're still 23 but some other people are long dead and you're now interacting with their great-great-grandkids. Uh, what?


Except... plenty of people over the years have been new to the community, and have ingratiated themselves into it just fine. In fact, the vast majority of people in the community joined during the era of "42 canon." Nor would I say that your knowledge of RS lore is absolute moot. On the first page, there has literally been discussion about the newest quest, and how the lore affects the status quo. Obviously, it still has a measure of importance, otherwise it would be utterly blindsided.

As to the timeskips, yet again, I agree. If there is a way to make that work for everyone, I'd love to explore it. Placing restrictions on timeskips, though, will almost certainly step on a few people's toes - namely those who want to get their characters' children played ASAP.

(cont.)
"Legacy. What is a legacy? It's planting seeds in a garden you never get to see."

Siberys | W42 RP'er |
Praise Madoka.

29-Apr-2016 17:19:48

Siberys

Siberys

Posts: 4,893 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
jagkilledme said :
Anything else is inadequate. The entire point between standardizing a system is to ensure quality, ease of operability (making things user-friendly) and ensuring compatibility.


While I agree with the three points in standardization, deeming everything else as inadequate... I have to disagree. Even with the abolishment of POK's, which I will get to, it wouldn't work by itself. You still have all the problems with RP combat that you have to deal with. A lack of a POK system is not going to stop someone calling somebody else out for a move they can't do.

jagkilledme said :
There's no way to do that but to make the standard the foundation that JaGeX has given us, which isn't really the case right now. We all know the lore and the timeline, and it's easy to search if we don't: the resource is easily available, we all know the RS wiki, but not all of us know or use the RSRP wiki. Resources for W42 canon are far, far more convoluted, which makes them too difficult to standardize.


Again, I'm not sure how what has been proposed is too difficult to even be feasible, as it really doesn't delve that much into the canon. Have guidelines for RP combat, introduce the do's and do not's for when you want to initiate a war (or if you're the defendant), et cetera. We're not delving years into 42's past here, requiring everyone to know what so-and-so did when he was ruler of a kingdom. We're just discussing how to make things less toxic. :|

Yet another continued post. I'll get to your main point eventually. ;-;
"Legacy. What is a legacy? It's planting seeds in a garden you never get to see."

Siberys | W42 RP'er |
Praise Madoka.

29-Apr-2016 17:30:04

Quick find code: 237-238-284-65784904 Back to Top