If you're being paid for 8 hours of work, you're expected to work for 8 hours.
Tenebri
said
:
they got their work done in 5.6 hours at home, at work place took 7.8 hours
Where in the study does it claim that the same amount of work was done in 5.6 hours at home as compared to 7.8 hours at work place?
18-May-2023 19:51:06
- Last edited on
18-May-2023 21:09:55
by
Origin Nexus
I'm not sure if I agree with Musk on a blanket statement saying you're categorically more productive while in work vs working from home. I think it can depend on the industry, the company, even down to teams within each company depending on the work they do.
I don't think it can be a blanket statement like that. Maybe in Twitter's case, he as the owner and CEO has deemed it more suitable for workers to be on site which as the head of Twitter, that's his right to take that stance.
There were a number of studies (during Covid, so a while back now) that found productivity wasn't as bad as people thought it would be and in a lot of cases either remained the same or improved. Some explanations I vaguely recall at the time were that you'd perhaps be "working" a little longer given you're not commuting. Also having less separation between work and home (which I found to be hard). In my condo, I work in the same area as I hangout in the evening too, so if my laptop/desk is next to me, I was more likely to check my emails or do a bit of work later into the evening than I normally would had I been in the office and then travelled home.
In any case, we have tools these days to facilitate remote work and that has become hugely popular both for employees and employers so utilizing those tools where necessary and/or appropriate is OK I think.
One thing I struggle with by being remote right now is a certain level of collaboration that Zoom/Slack just doesn't give you vs being in a meeting room and storyboarding, planning, designing etc.
The Tech sector also massively over-hired during Covid. I think that's on the companies, not the employees being hired, they just applied for those roles. Since then we've seen a bounce back where companies (Twitter included) has laid off a ton of workers.
Joel
said
:
The Tech sector also massively over-hired during Covid. I think that's on the companies, not the employees being hired, they just applied for those roles. Since then we've seen a bounce back where companies (Twitter included) has laid off a ton of workers.
I totally agree.
Twitter added 2500 employees during Covid, and went from earning income of almost a billion and a half dollars, to a net loss of over a billion dollars.
When it comes to business, you have to cut the fat, remove the waste, and get rid of the unnecessary, because if you don't, and your company is losing over $4 million per day, then eventually the company goes bankrupt and then
no-one
has a job.
There's definitely examples of hypocrisy but that article in particular seems to be pointing to examples where speech has violated local laws vs Twitter as a company or Musk as CEO just arbitrarily deciding what should and shouldn't be permitted to stay on the platform. So at least in those examples I'd say there's a slight difference no?
Someone can be in support of free speech but still be bound by laws that perhaps limit free speech in that given area.
Jeremy Cheng
said
:
Recent twitter changes are killing it off. Musk needs to revert them.
indeed he is limiting views...
thats literally the worse thing one can do where the advertisers, relies on views. why on earth would advertisers now want to carry on with twitter knowing there is a view limit for people...