^ Im going to disagree there. I found no issues with the way AB was presented on the storytelling front. Yes, the cast was large, but where in the rulebook does it say that EVERY CAST MEMBER has to have his/her past explored in intimate detail?
Just because they aren't explored, dosent mean they dont MATTER. Even if they are just there for the funny, funny was one of the prominent aspects of the story, because not only did it make it entertaining, it's removes the morbidity from the shows high mortality rate. Point is, alot of characters create the worlds 'colour' and it meant to be funny.
I would say that this is NOT a lack of storytelling ability, but more so a different kind of storytelling. Its something you notice in a lot of KEY works, a lot of the details and even the final resolution are left unexplained for the viewer to make conclusions about. Unless you either think hard, or dont think, you'll miss that.
Each story should be evaluated through its own individual merits, not through some preconceived formula of 'deliver plot point now'. All this said and done however, i can see little distinct difference in the delivery of the two save for the fact that Madoka is more a running narrative and AB was a semi-episodic narrative.
In conclusion, 'bad pacing' can hence be summarized as 'the storytelling did not conform to my preconceived notions as to how a premise should be explored and details revealed', and is therefore almost always purely subjective and not even worth a mention in a critical context.
Jesse B77, the guy who's watched Angel Beats at least 20 times.
05-Mar-2011 06:37:20
- Last edited on
05-Mar-2011 06:42:48
by
Jesse B77