Ya'know, off all the URL's you could have posted, that's is probably one of the least age friendly possible, better remove it. I should also point out that of the anime you listed, technically none of them will be affected because the bill wont come into force until halfway through next year.
Assuming it would however, i think you would find that if the tenets of the bill are applied using the "reasonable person" concept, most of those are quite safe.
The operative word in the legislation, at least as far as determining what will and will not be allowed, is 'glorifies', meaning that the subject in question has to be cast in a positive light or a something that one would seek.
Glorify
1. To give glory, honor, or high praise to; exalt.
2. To cause to be or seem more glorious or excellent than is actually the case: Your descriptions have glorified an average house into a mansion.
3. To give glory to, especially through worship.
I cant speak for Sora no Otoshimono, and i only saw one episode of Milky Holmes (didnt find anything i would ban under the bill. The ED sequence is questionable, but ts just bait for existing lolicons, not glorifying the practice).
As for the others, i cant say there's anything particularly glorifying there either. OreImo may get a little flak for promoting the sale of H games to 14 year olds, but thats not what your reffering to is it? Personally, i dont think Kirino X Kyosuke is sufficiently positively promoted in the anime (Probably caused by a lack of dere in the mix IMO)to warrant sanction under the act.
My thoughts on Yosuga No Sora are documented above. Haru X Sora seems like its going to have a negative result, so hardly is it a case of being glorified.
***** and stocking, i cant tell what would be an illegal ****** act there, uless you assume ***** is underaged of course. Given the art style, its hard to say. Most other characters appear highschool aged though, so im divided.
16-Dec-2010 00:33:33
- Last edited on
16-Dec-2010 00:38:42
by
Jesse B77
