Forums
R Quark (Rare Quark) FC / CC
Quick find code: 90-91-764-65641328
^ That's exactly what i meant (the unconfirmed trade part).
This makes ranges much more accurate cuz people try to keep prices high/low to buy back cheap or sell high by not confirming their trades.
Everyone got used to ranges and i don't think it's a good idea to change that. But an average would make them move more freely. But i think the change would be too much.
Ty for your post
Raise max cash! Click here to support!
This makes ranges much more accurate cuz people try to keep prices high/low to buy back cheap or sell high by not confirming their trades.
Everyone got used to ranges and i don't think it's a good idea to change that. But an average would make them move more freely. But i think the change would be too much.
Ty for your post
Ferenc2017
-
The Gamebreaker
Raise max cash! Click here to support!
05-Mar-2016 22:57:38
Ferenc2017
said
:
Everyone got used to ranges and i don't think it's a good idea to change that. But an average would make them move more freely. But i think the change would be too much.
Normally I agree 1000% that FC policies, rules, etc. should be changed as little as possible. With an FC that has been around for so long and that has had such great success, at some point you just have to settle for the fact that there is no longer room for improvement.
With that said, I used to be able to PC with only 1 range, and then that went up to 2 ranges, and on and on until now we have 7 ranges. At the same time, we have seen individual player wealth grow exponentially to what it is at now.
The people that actively trade party hats usually know that the ranges are not "accurate" due to the fact that they are inherently outdated since they are created with trades that were made in the past. So few confirmed trades are reported that the actual market value for a hat can be ±100m outside of the range. I think that a single number PC could be better understood and more easily updated to represent a fair market value for each PHat.
However, I think that most players would prefer to just keep the system how it is, so I will not argue my point any further. As always, the FC should go with the majority vote, which we have always done and should always do.
I like the current system, I like my proposed system, no matter which system we use, I win. That's exactly the kind of situation I like to be in, one in which I can't lose.
Everyone got used to ranges and i don't think it's a good idea to change that. But an average would make them move more freely. But i think the change would be too much.
Normally I agree 1000% that FC policies, rules, etc. should be changed as little as possible. With an FC that has been around for so long and that has had such great success, at some point you just have to settle for the fact that there is no longer room for improvement.
With that said, I used to be able to PC with only 1 range, and then that went up to 2 ranges, and on and on until now we have 7 ranges. At the same time, we have seen individual player wealth grow exponentially to what it is at now.
The people that actively trade party hats usually know that the ranges are not "accurate" due to the fact that they are inherently outdated since they are created with trades that were made in the past. So few confirmed trades are reported that the actual market value for a hat can be ±100m outside of the range. I think that a single number PC could be better understood and more easily updated to represent a fair market value for each PHat.
However, I think that most players would prefer to just keep the system how it is, so I will not argue my point any further. As always, the FC should go with the majority vote, which we have always done and should always do.
I like the current system, I like my proposed system, no matter which system we use, I win. That's exactly the kind of situation I like to be in, one in which I can't lose.
~Hyles~
"The man who acquires the ability to take full possession of his own mind
may take possession of anything else to which he is justly entitled."
may take possession of anything else to which he is justly entitled."
~Andrew Carnegie
06-Mar-2016 01:16:45
Heey, i thought after the last rank session there would be a list of who doesn't need to confirm phats for the compilation.
I want to post my compilation but i need to know this so i'm sure it's correct :c
And ty for the support for raising max cash
Poking jmods on twitter to take a look
Raise max cash! Click here to support!
I want to post my compilation but i need to know this so i'm sure it's correct :c
And ty for the support for raising max cash
Poking jmods on twitter to take a look
Ferenc2017
-
The Gamebreaker
Raise max cash! Click here to support!
12-Mar-2016 12:20:57
Happy birthday R Quark!
P.S. R Quark is obviously a he and not a she.
Edit: Just realized I misspelled "Quark"
P.S. R Quark is obviously a he and not a she.
Edit: Just realized I misspelled "Quark"
~Hyles~
"The man who acquires the ability to take full possession of his own mind
may take possession of anything else to which he is justly entitled."
may take possession of anything else to which he is justly entitled."
~Andrew Carnegie
18-Mar-2016 22:21:53 - Last edited on 26-Mar-2016 02:02:46 by Hyles
Quick find code: 90-91-764-65641328 Back to Top