forums.rs

Forums

Ninja Fixing Plans discussion

Quick find code: 86-87-866-65719646

of 8
Mattywarrior
Oct Member 2005

Mattywarrior

Posts: 17,692 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
It is worth noting that just because some suggestions where repeated, it does NOT nessiserily mean they will win in the survey.
Despite this, here is the Top 9 repeated suggestions:

1. Avatar recall / tracking (+cc icon) [41]
2. Clan Chat mute feature [37]
3. Recording who has capped on member list (+API Support) [25]
4. Clan Chat Guest White List /Filters [21]
5. Make anyone Avatar warden
(Part of Permission Rewrite)
[14]
6. Avatar worldwide skill boost [8]
7. Clan citadel upkeep removal [7]
8. Maxed Citadel stays maxed/(or reduced upkeep) [5]
9.1 Multiple Guest Chats (instead of just the one) [4]
9.2 Ability to change Avatar Buffs [4]
9.3 Clan Achievements Broadcasts [4]
9.4 Clan chat list - alphabetical (not lower case starting names under Cap names) [4]


If you have skipped to the end of the thread to see this Top 9, read the posts before this to view the full compiled list.
Don Mattywarrior
|
………………
……………...……….……
|
Mafia City

31-Dec-2015 01:18:08 - Last edited on 31-Dec-2015 01:18:50 by Mattywarrior

Mattywarrior
Oct Member 2005

Mattywarrior

Posts: 17,692 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
3. Recording who has capped on member list (+API Support) [25]

This was also my top suggestion as I also feel is would be a much valued update and potentially not too much work to implement as the triggers are already in place as shown in my mockup.

Here is the mockup I would use as a minimum to track 4 states of citadel activity:
http://puu.sh/mlCah.jpg


Using this setup would give us a far greater activity tracking abilities compared to just fully capped, because I know many people do not completely cap if upkeep is met for example, but the majority do tend to hit the quarry masters approval.

Finally, it is essential to simply add API support with this setup, outputting the status as a mere 0 1 2 3, in order for off sites to track these with ease, and potentially add a total counter to keep track of pervious weeks in a much quicker time than it would for the web team to add(since they have a massive workload).
Don Mattywarrior
|
………………
……………...……….……
|
Mafia City

06-Jan-2016 16:03:04

Scret
Mar Member 2018

Scret

Posts: 25,434 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Mattywarrior said :
3. Recording who has capped on member list (+API Support) [25]

This was also my top suggestion as I also feel is would be a much valued update and potentially not too much work to implement as the triggers are already in place as shown in my mockup.

Here is the mockup I would use as a minimum to track 4 states of citadel activity:
http://puu.sh/mlCah.jpg


Using this setup would give us a far greater activity tracking abilities compared to just fully capped, because I know many people do not completely cap if upkeep is met for example, but the majority do tend to hit the quarry masters approval.

Finally, it is essential to simply add API support with this setup, outputting the status as a mere 0 1 2 3, in order for off sites to track these with ease, and potentially add a total counter to keep track of pervious weeks in a much quicker time than it would for the web team to add(since they have a massive workload).

Nice one, although should we label it as capped? i know its the common word used but it is kinda slang within clan communities, a newcomer viewing clans would be confused by it?
`*•.¸(*•.¸(`*•.¸+¸.•*´)¸.•*)¸.•*´
+«´¨`•°
SKILL SCHOOL
•´¨`»+
. .•*(¸.•*´(¸.•*´+`*•.¸)`*•.¸)*•.

07-Jan-2016 10:51:16

Zyphix
Sep Member 2010

Zyphix

Posts: 3,919 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
7. Clan citadel upkeep removal [7]
8. Maxed Citadel stays maxed/(or reduced upkeep) [5]

^ LOL WUT?

Upkeep removal? Hasn't this been discussed before and veto'd?
Upkeep already has been reduced before also. Clan:
l||l°~
Void Nation
~°l||l
|
20+ Veteran
|
Balance is Eternal

JAGeX Verified Clan Site:
voidnation.boards.n3t

08-Jan-2016 07:58:30

Mod Matthe

Mod Matthe

Jagex Moderator Forum Profile Posts by user
They were features some people were keen to request, but are not changes we would be making even if they had been higher up the list. Mod MattHe | Former Community Manager, now in Events & occasional Lore Monkey

08-Jan-2016 15:42:19

Esploratore
Apr Member 2006

Esploratore

Posts: 1,675 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Mod Matthe said :
They were features some people were keen to request, but are not changes we would be making even if they had been higher up the list.

As I recall, something similar was said in the past related to cool down.

Capping/Upkeep isn't popular with members of many clans.

It's become a weekly, time-consuming burden that takes up more playing time than it should.

If we still must pay upkeep for our citadels, it shouldn't require more than about half an hour of our time each week. Two hours is unreasonable, especially for players who play a healthy amount of time. Some weeks, citadel capping is the only game activity my clan mates have had the time to do. With all the other content the game has to offer, that's not right.

Jagex must be aware that it's a problem since they've offered citadel boosters. If boosters remain as the only means to shorten capping time, it will be a decision based primarily on corporate greed. Upkeep shackles us to playing the content while feeding that greed.

08-Jan-2016 20:10:18

Morilinde

Morilinde

Posts: 18,003 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Esploratore said :
It's become a weekly, time-consuming burden that takes up more playing time than it should.

If we still must pay upkeep for our citadels, it shouldn't require more than about half an hour of our time each week. Two hours is unreasonable, especially for players who play a healthy amount of time. Some weeks, citadel capping is the only game activity my clan mates have had the time to do. With all the other content the game has to offer, that's not right.
Hmm this is a good reason. Yeah I can see where you're coming from.

I'd support cutting the individual resource cap in half and all upkeep/upgrade/customisation costs in half too. Hmm.. But this may give trouble on update with already collected resources, and contributions to customisations over the past weeks or months... So..
Another idea (with the same outcome) is to increase the base amount of resources gathered per action, whilst still ensuring that the exp/h rate stays the same. The result will be that you'll be done quicker, and get less exp from the total citadel resource cap than is the case now.

edit: perhaps the avatar buff 'skill plot bonus' could be involved too? Maybe a reworked/enhanced version with much bigger speed and area cover increase or so Thranduil | King of the Elves of the Wood

08-Jan-2016 22:00:57 - Last edited on 08-Jan-2016 23:36:44 by Morilinde

Quick find code: 86-87-866-65719646 Back to Top