Goldfire - For the record, in the US Federal Law does trump company EULA and ToS agreements. Regardless of what is put into one. I would lookup consumer protection & supremacy laws, specifically the 2015 update variant, as well as laws that state federal law trumps contractual agreement (such as the Supremacy Clause). We do in fact "own (license)" our digital purchases to a limited extent, and those protections
Do, in point of fact, guarantee us right to refund if product is altered post-purchase for any reason, digital purchase or no, as that would leave it susceptible to laws under false advertisement, false trade, etc etc etc. And this isn't just for Drakes, or even Runescape, but all things Digital, and even non-digital.
We may not have redistribution rights, but we do as a point of fact, have a measure of protection and rights at time of purchase. This isn't really the forum for a discussion on trade law however, so I'l leave that point at that.
That note aside and going back to the Drakes & Cosmetics, I fail to see how anything else you listed goes against anything I posted. I'm not really interested in your specific level of hardware.
My point is simply that as players, we don't know what the hardware of any other player just so happens to be, and so speaking shouldn't be our concern whether or not their particular level of hardware can handle some extra pixels in the form of a legally used pet one can again, legally refuse to put away.
I'm not making a point to bash peoples hardware should it be inferior, I'm making a point that it's not my, nor anyone else's concern that some players may lag, and that that's their own issue to sort through by their own means.
Again, harsh, but fair and logical.
Again, a
Very Strong No Support.
Players should be forced to view
- there's no point in a purchasing a cosmetic to show off if you can't be guaranteed people are viewing.
25-Apr-2019 06:55:13
- Last edited on
25-Apr-2019 07:12:26
by
Sigmarthus