Forums

Repeal the G.E. Tax Please!

Quick find code: 74-75-416-66273172

john-punkguy
Apr Member 2005

john-punkguy

Posts: 1,604 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Well said Ruby_Red0

With no repeal of the tax or light at the end of the tunnel, at what point does the tyranny of the command structure demand more radical action?

Surely adapting and grudgingly accepting that ongoing theft will now be normalized can't stand?

Neck Head has a point; we're paying real money to play a game, why do we need to deal with taxes? A simple question with probably no legit answers coming from the power structure.
This is The Modern Rome Burning. Stand up. Fight back.

24-Jan-2023 17:48:25

A  Cole
Nov Member 2003

A  Cole

Posts: 14,682 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
The only mistake Jagex made with this update is calling it a tax.

It is not a tax, it is a convenience fee based on the value of the product you are selling to sell that item on the Grand Exchange.

There are methods of trading your items while not paying the convenience fee. If it were a "tax", do you think they'd let us use these free methods?

You're all talking like Jagex are profiteering from this, almost in the same way as people may talk about tax rises lining government pockets in the real world. Clearly this cannot be the case as what value does GP actually have in the real world - especially when Jagex can just "print" as much of it as they like?

No player will have noticed this 2% difference in trades, but please let me know if you have noticed - I'm intrigued as to what items you are trading.


~A~

24-Jan-2023 19:05:41

Ruby_Red0
Jun Member 2022

Ruby_Red0

Posts: 188 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
No one has accused Jagex of doing anything other than not hearing what the majority of their playerbase wants, which was, I believe, a mistake.

I understand the importance of getting a big turn out on social media platforms. I hope myself to be a content creator in the distant future, at which point I will work to become monetized, gather sponsors and advertizers, and earn an income on the amount of people I can get to come see the content I created.

Sometimes, those payments from social media platforms become more than what is gleaned from an actual product or service. Afterall, people might follow you on social media easy enough, but that doesnt mean they will ever actually pay for your product or service.

As actual players, we are all paying for a service, with the exception of f2p. If we buy game cards, most of us will pay sales tax on that purchase. So I hope that helps make more sense for some as to why there are people comparing buying game time in the real world, and then having what you paid for nibbled at in the GE.

They made a mistake by merrily telling everyone we are doing this to help out this group over here.

Well, that group over there, if they are not part of a tight ingame network - and I can honestly testify that there are numerous top-notch PvMers that are not - they are going to be getting hit at the GE too.

Will this result in Jagex and the PvM Community remaining euphoric over this? I have no idea.

If the motivation was to get players to try PvM, JMods could have coordinated ingame runs on advertized "No Cost Death" weekends or weeks, like they did with the new release a few months ago. That's when I got my feet wet, but I was only level 112, my skills were lacking, and I told the people I ran with I was not ready yet, because I wasnt.

Im not certain that that was the motivation at all.
New(ish) Player
:
This is YOUR world, and I'm just a squirrel tryin' to get a nut.
;)
RS3: The game where RWTers are more important than Real Live Players

24-Jan-2023 19:36:57 - Last edited on 24-Jan-2023 19:46:57 by Ruby_Red0

Ruby_Red0
Jun Member 2022

Ruby_Red0

Posts: 188 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
As a consumer, I know what my options are. As I said, no one controls my purse string but me.
If no one that can change this wants to hear me there is really only one thing I can do about that that might be noticed by a company. They claim they want your style of gameplay to shift to PvM, and thats why this was done - to help those poor PvMers, along with the side benefit of balancing the apparently out-of-wack state the game economy is in.

I am preparing to change my style of gameplay. I am preparing to exercize my rights as a consumer. I am not leaving RS3, I still have hope for it, but merely returning to my roots so to speak.

I am happy with this choice for myself. It is for everyone to decide what makes them happy.

Have fun all! :)
New(ish) Player
:
This is YOUR world, and I'm just a squirrel tryin' to get a nut.
;)
RS3: The game where RWTers are more important than Real Live Players

24-Jan-2023 19:37:06 - Last edited on 24-Jan-2023 19:57:11 by Ruby_Red0

A  Cole
Nov Member 2003

A  Cole

Posts: 14,682 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
If the motivation was to get players to try PvM, JMods could have coordinated ingame runs on advertized "No Cost Death" weekends or weeks, like they did with the new release a few months ago. That's when I got my feet wet, but I was only level 112, my skills were lacking, and I told the people I ran with I was not ready yet, because I wasnt.

Im not certain that that was the motivation at all.
This is exactly why they made the update, but not the only reason.

As I've explained before, the only players to potentially gain from this update are those that are not good at PvM. After all, if you're good at PvM, you are never going to be paying out death costs regardless. The higher death costs were merely putting pressure on those learning to PvM, or those who were not very good. This is clearly not balanced at all.

So Jagex went and rebalanced death costs to make it more fair to those starting out. Whilst maybe not incentivising players to go PvM, it certainly paved the way to making PvM more accessible.

However, with the death cost balance came less GP being removed from the game. This is where the GE convenience fee comes in. Based on the Dev Blog, it was the most fair way of removing the GP required from the game to keep inflation in check. Any other way would have disproportionally affected small areas of the player base whilst not being 100% effective.

The GE tax is the most fair, effective, and minimalistic method of removing GP from the game - something that the "majority of the player base" has been wanting for a while now.


~A~

24-Jan-2023 20:08:17

Mel 624
Dec Member 2021

Mel 624

Posts: 744 Steel Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I was mostly pointing it out because getting too ranty would get the thread moved to rants or some posts deleted for spamming/flaming. Rant threads are where you vent about problems you're mad about without necessarily expecting a solution while other sections focus more on troubleshooting and discussing solutions. Even if you don't expect it to get fixed, actually talking about ways it can be will have it out there to potentially happen with enough support.

The ge tax is a tax, if not the kind used IRL. While I don't see much benefit in talking about it like real taxes or brushing aside the nuances of good and bad use of IRL taxation, there are very much problems with how and why they did this. What you choose to call it doesn't really change that it's taking money from players in a way that people have reason to consider unfair and an undesired way of dealing with the situation.

While in theory in person trades are an option, the risk of scamming and the myriad issues around it made it pretty unpleasant by comparison. That's why the GE was made in the first place and even then there are people spamming the chat with buy/sell offers. You can't reasonably treat trades as a viable alternative to the GE for anything but the rare items people already mostly trade in person.

Solving the gold inflation situation should've involved directly addressing the cause of the inflation and better player feedback/involvement in the process than just slapping a tax on everyone and claiming it was for our own good. The way they left out important details in the stats, downplayed PvM's role in it to justify the death cost reduction and didn't really explain why this or that solution wasn't being done just feels disingenuous. Players should've gotten to actually talk about which options they preferred and just generally been more involved in the process of balancing the economy in a way most people would be satisfied with.

The most fair solution would be an alchemy nerf.
How to block a forum user

Death And Taxes: An Analysis

24-Jan-2023 22:21:03

A  Cole
Nov Member 2003

A  Cole

Posts: 14,682 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
The most fair solution would be an alchemy nerf.
Jagex stated in the Dev Blog that this was not a viable solution.

Don't get me wrong, I agree that either reducing the alch value across the board by 5-10%, or decreasing the rate of alch machines by 5-10%, would have been a fair resolution to tackling the income from alchemy. However, we don't know what other reasons are behind the decision not to go this way.

Perhaps since Invention machines have come along, there has been a huge drop in alchemy bots. If the effectiveness of the machines is reduced, could this risk the return of more bots perhaps?


~A~

24-Jan-2023 23:38:38 - Last edited on 24-Jan-2023 23:39:04 by A  Cole

Ruby_Red0
Jun Member 2022

Ruby_Red0

Posts: 188 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Im not ranting, and it would be nice if you would stop claiming I am.

I am certainly capable of getting too ranty, as any one is capable of doing. I believe there is value in rising above emotion whenever possible. As I said - I would prefer calm, intelligent and polite discussion.

It is polite to take me at my word.

I was providing a historical basis that is culturally significant to certain nationalities, as I said I was when I made the post, as to why people are crying "Taxation = Theft". Clearly more than one player has made it onto the forums to voice that opinion.

A Cole says they are the Minority.
A Cole says I and you are the Minority.

Which of us holds more sway? I would guess A Cole.

I do believe the majority said, "Death costs are one reason I dont PvM."

I cant imagine a true poll of the player base came back with, "Yes! By all that is sacred in Runescape, please take 2% of my GE earnings so that the game can support lowering PvM Death costs even though most of us dont participate in PvM." I dont encounter such a loving spirit in game that often, sorry.

I do believe the majority said, "Death costs are one reason I dont PvM."

I can be wrong. Time will tell if I am.

Time will tell if Mel, and John-Punkguy and I Love Ass and anyone else that has chimed in against this is wrong. Clearly we are here, and I dont remember anyone asking my opinion.

I have personally contributed a good amount to balancing the budget yesterday and today while I organize and clean out my bank in preparation. Im not getting rid of everything P2p, but I had a lot of backups that I may not ever use in the end.

If someones - mine or the games - direction changes the option is there for my perception to change.

Im done. Nice meeting you all.
New(ish) Player
:
This is YOUR world, and I'm just a squirrel tryin' to get a nut.
;)
RS3: The game where RWTers are more important than Real Live Players

24-Jan-2023 23:45:30

Ruby_Red0
Jun Member 2022

Ruby_Red0

Posts: 188 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Lastly.

What Benjamin Franklin felt was more harmful than taxes....


“Sloth makes all things difficult, but industry all easy; and he that riseth late must trot all day, and shall scarce overtake his business at night; while laziness travels so slowly, that poverty soon overtakes him.”

~ Benjamin Franklin


Perhaps it was just the easiest thing to do.
New(ish) Player
:
This is YOUR world, and I'm just a squirrel tryin' to get a nut.
;)
RS3: The game where RWTers are more important than Real Live Players

24-Jan-2023 23:52:38 - Last edited on 24-Jan-2023 23:55:22 by Ruby_Red0

Quick find code: 74-75-416-66273172 Back to Top