Okay, the comma after, “factory,” can go since, “where dreams were born,” is part of the phrase. And were in reference to building should be was. Your subject and predicate need to agree.
--Here, I’m using the subjunctive tense. While it may sound weird, it is grammatically correct to use ‘were’ here if I *were* in the subjunctive. If I weren’t in the subjunctive, I would indeed be incorrect.
“There were beautiful mahogany furniture, huge water fountains in the garden, and gilded shrines, none of which I could afford.”
The comma after, “shrines,” can be replaced with a dash mark in order to distinguish that, “none of which I can afford,” is not part of the list you established at the beginning of the sentence.
--Yes indeed.
“The first was those who inherited their wealth from a senior, more experienced player, like a legacy, when they left the game.”
“Like a legacy,” seems to interrupt the flow of the sentence, and it really isn’t necessary. One does not need to be a legacy in order to rich in RuneScape. I would simply remove it.
--Must have been confused there. The ‘legacy’ was referring to the wealth, not the experienced players themselves.
**I think he is a hacker, he drops twenty millions every week.’”
Two complete phrases should not be joined with a comma. A semi-colon is more appropriate.
--I think I’d use a full-stop in here because the two clauses don’t seem too closely related.
“The gold twinkled in his hands as he converted, with a passion, a pile of bank notes into cold, hard, cash.”
“Cash,” is not part of the list. In fact, the bone being converted is said to be cold cash and hard cash. So there should be no comma after hard. The phrase is, “cold, hard cash.”
--I see what you mean. I’ll change that.
“I could only stare ahead, in one direction, oblivious to my surrounding, ignoring them at all costs.”
The comma after, “ahead,” can be removed since you’re breaking up a phrase. “Surrounding,” should be, “surroundings.”
08-May-2011 15:48:01