In my opinion, fight scenes should be few and very far between in stories. This is because, when I see a scene in which characters are engaged primarily in direct action that does not necessarily have to build the plot, I want to see a masterpiece. Yours seemed rather short, and so I think this is where the discontent arises.
If I were to offer advice, I would say that either a) you don't term it a fight scene and leave it as is, which is a perfectly viable option; or b) you expand upon what exactly happens, going into intricate and meticulous detail of each and every action that is occurring. This latter is more important if you're planning on having future fight scenes because readers will extrapolate from their first impressions. Even if your prose is great, if your action is flawed, this is how the audience will remember your piece as a whole.
For most readers, the prose is boring, the action is good. And because of this, readers remember stories not based on the quality of syntax or the format of paragraphs but moreso the ability of the author to describe the action. Since fight scenes are the epitome of action, you should really focus on making them the best that they can possibly be.
In this particular fight scene, I would work on variation in diction (you used the word "hit" twice is relative succession) as well as more elaborate description of what is happening. When people say add more description to newer writers (which is not to say that you seem amateur), they mean in action. Especially in fight scenes.
Also, you end Chapter 7 with "End of Chapter 6", as a note of clarification.
27-Feb-2010 05:22:27