---------- Sol LongClaw ----------
Judge A: There are several grammatical errors throughout the piece. While they do not make the story unreadable, they are a bit distracting from the plot. The story interested me, but I think the grammar made it more of a challenge to read. The characters seem a little flat, but 10,000 figures is a small limit to write a story, so I understand that development does not always work the best in such a short piece. I love the metaphor you create toward the end of the piece through the creature's consumption of the over-zealous Inquisitor. All in all, if you clean up the grammar a bit, I think this would make a wonderful longer story. You really ought to think about extending it. Nicely done; I really enjoyed this. (2.5/5)
---
Judge B: This was an interesting approach to the theme, with an enticing opening paragraph, which immediately had me captivated.
Be careful not to overuse words/phrases too much: for example you used "contorting constantly" twice. Capitalisation is also an issue, for there were times when you capitalised certain words which didn't need to be capitalised. Spelling is another problem; take the time to read over your work and use a spellchecker--it generally makes the story a more enjoyable read.
I felt that there were quite a few loopholes in this entry, and at times it progresses too quickly that it detracts from its overall impact. There are also points at which it seems lacking in depth: the way the two men simply left Marius, for example, was not very realistic and nonsensical, for who would leave a dying companion?
Aside from those issues, this entry had potential and I feel had it been giving more attention and refinery, it would have been a great piece. The description is detailed and is one of the strongest points--it is the plot and characterisation which I feel is the weakest part of this story. (2.5/5)
---
Continued in the next post.
05-Aug-2012 22:44:18