Much of your history with EoZ is incorrect.
• EoZ entered when TKT and Allies fought against Darkeet and Allies, which was a 200 v. 200 war. The ending results were 70 v. 0 (TKT winning).
• The tensions between Jack (TKT) were caused due to his break with the Ghandian Alliance (consisting of Jack, Hank, Roi, and Juliana). BL and EOZ together politically smashed him.
• The Cold War with Bloodlines included an ally war between Undead Alliance & Bloodlines v. Siparis and the Empire of Zaros, in which it was considered void, however, the Clan Wars match was theoretically won by EoZ/Siparis, however, no stakes were lost.
• KoA was warred by the Empire of Zaros, in which they were eliminated from the first war against the Empire of Zaros (if necessary, see the video).
• Jona surrendered to the Empire of Zaros on the second war declaration of the Fallen Crusade, which he was given Falador in compensation for his loss.
• To end the Fallen Crusade, The Kazans were attacked, and after they lost, they blamed Big Guy and Katsu for cheating in the battles, while mercenaries working for the Kazans themselves said that the Kazans had employed them, going against the no-mercenary rule, resulting in a forfeit/loss either way.
• The ending of the Fallen Crusades in World 31 (led by EoZ) promised that the new league would give land to the clans that deserved it, not the larger clans who hogged BL/EoZ's land after TLW fought against EOZ.
I personally think your evaluation of Bloodlines, KOG, and the Empire of Zaros are very biased in this history. If it weren't for the three clans that you portrayed as monsters, there would be still 10 pages about how the Rovins and the Iroks are fighting over a Rune full helmet. Honestly, not only the old Republic days should be proclaimed as significant figures of World 31, because probably one of the most impacting wars in the war (which you stated was the longest and most tensed) was BL v. EoZ, showing both our significance.
26-Feb-2012 20:57:16
