I've heard that about a lot of games, mostly movies though. Oh I believe you, this sounds like a game that takes years to master, and having the monopoly on anything but having most dead soldiers sounds like a stretch. You can have your entire camp & army be in the sky? That sounds epic! Of course you'd be vulnerable to AA attacks, but that would be amazing!
Well like I said, smarter does not mean better. He could be really smart at chess, but you could be knowledge in Psychology and attack him there rather than face him where he is strong. Throw him off his game, intimidate him, make him over think, make him lose his confidence, etc.
=D I thank you for that compliment! The good thing about having this attitude is that stronger people actually want to play with me, because they like to win, & they tire of fighting me faster than I do of fighting them. It's a good thing you don't mind, =P Because I don't know how many times I've repeated myself, or am going to again in the future!
I had never thought of it that way, but you are completely right! I had always wondered why fighting humans was harder than the AI, since the AI is a computer based on logic and numbers it should be the perfect enemy, but humans are always hard to defeat. Well actually, I guess that if the computer has is not limited by bounds it will be harder to defeat it than to defeat a human; just like when the best chess player in the world lost to the computer.
12-Jun-2012 16:32:09