On page 4 post 5, you forgot a . at the end of tornado, at end of second paragraph.
So the great demon is summoned and a doom has befallen mankind; mankind is the core reason of its own downfall. But a villain asking itself, 'what have I done?' is a bit of a cliché, hm? I've simply read that line so many times that it has lost its effectiveness for me. The idea of a demonic force trying to eradicate human beings is also a cliché, but I'm sure you will utilise more ideas and characters to full extent that will overlap my bias.
How the dagger was used was realistic; often a dagger would get stuck amidst the ribs, but the description of the dagger being twisted and removed makes the duel feel real.
Speaking of the first assault, was it happening during nighttime? If so, then it's rather pointless for archers to be positioned above the walls, seeing as they wouldn't be able to see what they would be shooting at. If the assault occurred during daytime, then the above and below can be mostly ignored.
Guards on walls were often heavily equipped men-at-arms or sergeants; middle-class soldiers who were equipped with polearms (Such as axes, spears, or halberds) and crossbows (crossbows are easy to use, that's why they were used extensively), and often armoured with thick, heavy gambesons, and some kind of helmet such as a kettlehat or skullcap. The Maciejowski Bible clearly portrays that castle garrisons were equipped with said items; they had to be armoured enough to withstand arrows but flexible enough to run along the walls and use a crossbow. Of course, during sieges, even peasants would be on walls even if only to throw rocks at the opposing force.
Crossbowmen were used on walls more often than archers; bows are offensive, crossbows are defensive, and bows require more room to be loaded effectively. After all, a loaded crossbow is like a rifle; the crossbowman can take cover and then pick his shot when he felt comfortable.
09-Jul-2012 07:44:17
- Last edited on
09-Jul-2012 07:47:18
by
Azigarath