Forums
Bounty Hunter Rewards Part 2
Quick find code: 380-381-92-65471904
Cryogen
said
:
I voted no to Dragon Defender, simply because I don't think this is a good way to introduce it. Perhaps a bit selfish, but I don't want useful items like that to come from dangerous PvP activities.
Good job mate! *internet high five*
I voted no to Dragon Defender, simply because I don't think this is a good way to introduce it. Perhaps a bit selfish, but I don't want useful items like that to come from dangerous PvP activities.
Good job mate! *internet high five*
08-Sep-2014 16:04:17
Though i do not pk there are some pretty neat things that will be useful for those whom do.
LODJ RS3 Division
LODJ OSRS Division
LODJ RS3 Division
LODJ OSRS Division
08-Sep-2014 16:48:39
Beatrix
said
:
Cryogen said :
I voted no to Dragon Defender, simply because I don't think this is a good way to introduce it. Perhaps a bit selfish, but I don't want useful items like that to come from dangerous PvP activities.
Good job mate! *internet high five*
You're both idiots. There's absolutely no negative impact between having the Dragon Defender come out by simply killing more Cyclops after the Rune Defender and having it come out by requiring an item to unlock the new defender. The only difference is with the PvP shop, there's both rewards for PKing along with a gold sink to further stabilize the economy.
You complained and complained about PvP rewards having a negative impact on the economy, yet you vote no against the only reward coming out that will actually improve it. You're both stupid, neither of you will ever PK a day in your life and because of you, one of the only profitable rewards that would have held it's value is going to be voted no on.
Hopefully Jagex just re-polls this nonstop until it passes rather than accommodating stupid people.
Cryogen said :
I voted no to Dragon Defender, simply because I don't think this is a good way to introduce it. Perhaps a bit selfish, but I don't want useful items like that to come from dangerous PvP activities.
Good job mate! *internet high five*
You're both idiots. There's absolutely no negative impact between having the Dragon Defender come out by simply killing more Cyclops after the Rune Defender and having it come out by requiring an item to unlock the new defender. The only difference is with the PvP shop, there's both rewards for PKing along with a gold sink to further stabilize the economy.
You complained and complained about PvP rewards having a negative impact on the economy, yet you vote no against the only reward coming out that will actually improve it. You're both stupid, neither of you will ever PK a day in your life and because of you, one of the only profitable rewards that would have held it's value is going to be voted no on.
Hopefully Jagex just re-polls this nonstop until it passes rather than accommodating stupid people.
08-Sep-2014 16:55:01
pooping afk
said
:
Beatrix said :
Cryogen said :
I voted no to Dragon Defender, simply because I don't think this is a good way to introduce it. Perhaps a bit selfish, but I don't want useful items like that to come from dangerous PvP activities.
Good job mate! *internet high five*
You're both idiots. There's absolutely no negative impact between having the Dragon Defender come out by simply killing more Cyclops after the Rune Defender and having it come out by requiring an item to unlock the new defender. The only difference is with the PvP shop, there's both rewards for PKing along with a gold sink to further stabilize the economy.
You complained and complained about PvP rewards having a negative impact on the economy, yet you vote no against the only reward coming out that will actually improve it. You're both stupid, neither of you will ever PK a day in your life and because of you, one of the only profitable rewards that would have held it's value is going to be voted no on.
Hopefully Jagex just re-polls this nonstop until it passes rather than accommodating stupid people.
Nice ad hominem, mate. To me, D-Defender (or a token to access it) coming from PVP is a very negative thing. And implementing new things is never only black and white, saying one thing is bad and another is good, the game is played by many people and everyone has their own, unique opinion.
Having a perfectly valid opinion on a controversial matter doesn't make anyone stupid. Insulting others over their opinion, however... well, shouldn't be tolerated.
(Mods, do your work for once.)
Beatrix said :
Cryogen said :
I voted no to Dragon Defender, simply because I don't think this is a good way to introduce it. Perhaps a bit selfish, but I don't want useful items like that to come from dangerous PvP activities.
Good job mate! *internet high five*
You're both idiots. There's absolutely no negative impact between having the Dragon Defender come out by simply killing more Cyclops after the Rune Defender and having it come out by requiring an item to unlock the new defender. The only difference is with the PvP shop, there's both rewards for PKing along with a gold sink to further stabilize the economy.
You complained and complained about PvP rewards having a negative impact on the economy, yet you vote no against the only reward coming out that will actually improve it. You're both stupid, neither of you will ever PK a day in your life and because of you, one of the only profitable rewards that would have held it's value is going to be voted no on.
Hopefully Jagex just re-polls this nonstop until it passes rather than accommodating stupid people.
Nice ad hominem, mate. To me, D-Defender (or a token to access it) coming from PVP is a very negative thing. And implementing new things is never only black and white, saying one thing is bad and another is good, the game is played by many people and everyone has their own, unique opinion.
Having a perfectly valid opinion on a controversial matter doesn't make anyone stupid. Insulting others over their opinion, however... well, shouldn't be tolerated.
(Mods, do your work for once.)
08-Sep-2014 17:26:48
Quick find code: 380-381-92-65471904 Back to Top