forums.rs

Forums

Dev blog: Poll 9 feat. Godwars Thread is locked

Quick find code: 380-381-5-65435455

of 45
D-Block

D-Block

Posts: 17,856 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
New suggestion: Broad bolts!

Perhaps as a drop from spiritual rangers? makes em less useless

Or, a more controversial one: drop from aviansies, to make up for lack of addy bars

I like that. As bad as the noted bars were, they actually made arma KC worth something.
Vita non est vivere sed valere vita est.

30-Aug-2013 19:24:40

lukalib

lukalib

Posts: 70 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Also, on the topic of people talking about wanting to add Rigour and Augury, pures should be able to have access to them as well just as they did originally. There should not be a 70 defence cap for these two prayers.

Why shouldn't they have the same def requirements as Piety?

Why should they? Pre-eoc pures had access to them, and it gave them a reason to level up prayer past 52. The more content the better for everybody. It was never overpowered either.

30-Aug-2013 19:24:54

Norne
Jan
fmod Member
2012

Norne

Forum Moderator Posts: 76,250 Emerald Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
Rigour and augury should have a 70 defence + completed knights waves requirement.

Knight waves is melee only, so I sorta disagree with the last part if it happens. "When history witnesses a great change, Razgriz reveals itself... first, as a dark demon. As a demon, it uses its power to rain death upon the land, and then it dies. However, after a period of slumber, Razgriz returns, this time, as a great hero"

30-Aug-2013 19:26:05

Norne
Jan
fmod Member
2012

Norne

Forum Moderator Posts: 76,250 Emerald Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Also, on the topic of people talking about wanting to add Rigour and Augury, pures should be able to have access to them as well just as they did originally. There should not be a 70 defence cap for these two prayers.

Why shouldn't they have the same def requirements as Piety?

Why should they? Pre-eoc pures had access to them, and it gave them a reason to level up prayer past 52. The more content the better for everybody. It was never overpowered either.

So by the definition of the more content the better, then giving piety to everyone with 70 prayer regardless of def level is kewl by you?

I think such an idea is bad personally, since the power they exhibit is counter balanced by the need for a decent defense lvl. "When history witnesses a great change, Razgriz reveals itself... first, as a dark demon. As a demon, it uses its power to rain death upon the land, and then it dies. However, after a period of slumber, Razgriz returns, this time, as a great hero"

30-Aug-2013 19:28:38

The Puss

The Puss

Posts: 1,273 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Also, on the topic of people talking about wanting to add Rigour and Augury, pures should be able to have access to them as well just as they did originally. There should not be a 70 defence cap for these two prayers.

Why shouldn't they have the same def requirements as Piety?

Why should they? Pre-eoc pures had access to them, and it gave them a reason to level up prayer past 52. The more content the better for everybody. It was never overpowered either.

So by the definition of the more content the better, then giving piety to everyone with 70 prayer regardless of def level is kewl by you?

I think such an idea is bad personally, since the power they exhibit is counter balanced by the need for a decent defense lvl.

pures do not deserve the ability to access high level content. You choose to limit your account then suffer without better abilities and equipment....

i love nothing more than to go do deep wild pkn and release all my frustration on the feeble embodiment of a 1def pure watching in satisfaction as my dds cuts and dismantles your sturdy ghostly robes....

30-Aug-2013 19:32:13 - Last edited on 30-Aug-2013 19:33:07 by The Puss

lukalib

lukalib

Posts: 70 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Also, on the topic of people talking about wanting to add Rigour and Augury, pures should be able to have access to them as well just as they did originally. There should not be a 70 defence cap for these two prayers.

Why shouldn't they have the same def requirements as Piety?

Why should they? Pre-eoc pures had access to them, and it gave them a reason to level up prayer past 52. The more content the better for everybody. It was never overpowered either.

So by the definition of the more content the better, then giving piety to everyone with 70 prayer regardless of def level is kewl by you?

I think such an idea is bad personally, since the power they exhibit is counter balanced by the need for a decent defense lvl.

In order to get piety you need to complete the training grounds, you never had to do that for Rigour or Augury. I just want to build my pure like I did pre-eoc, nothing regarding these two prayers was broken or overpowered (from a pure perspective), so why try to fix it? It always was balanced because 77 prayer raises your combat quite a bit, and the higher combat pures are, the weaker they become in 1v1 situations.

30-Aug-2013 19:35:02

lukalib

lukalib

Posts: 70 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Also, on the topic of people talking about wanting to add Rigour and Augury, pures should be able to have access to them as well just as they did originally. There should not be a 70 defence cap for these two prayers.

Why shouldn't they have the same def requirements as Piety?

Why should they? Pre-eoc pures had access to them, and it gave them a reason to level up prayer past 52. The more content the better for everybody. It was never overpowered either.

So by the definition of the more content the better, then giving piety to everyone with 70 prayer regardless of def level is kewl by you?

I think such an idea is bad personally, since the power they exhibit is counter balanced by the need for a decent defense lvl.

pures do not deserve the ability to access high level content. You choose to limit your account then suffer without better abilities and equipment....

i love nothing more than to go do deep wild pkn and release all my frustration on the feeble embodiment of a 1def pure watching in satisfaction as my dds cuts and dismantles your sturdy ghostly robes....

This is coming from a main, some people only play on pures and max them out. Pures make up a large portion of the community, and content should not be limited by the opinion of mains. I think we should at least get a poll for this if it ever comes up.

30-Aug-2013 19:37:38

X Plode

X Plode

Posts: 575 Steel Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I really don't think changing dragon boot drops to "dragon material" is necessary.

Yeah it might devalue rune boots a little, but wouldn't it make spiritual mages less profitable? You'd just be getting an add on, instead of the final product, so I'd assume the "dragon material" would be worth less than actual dragon boots.

30-Aug-2013 19:40:16

Angel2D4

Angel2D4

Posts: 15,772 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
I really don't think changing dragon boot drops to "dragon material" is necessary.

Yeah it might devalue rune boots a little, but wouldn't it make spiritual mages less profitable? You'd just be getting an add on, instead of the final product, so I'd assume the "dragon material" would be worth less than actual dragon boots.

But there is NO requirement to add them to rune boots, so I don't see how that's an issue (providing you have the rune boots already).

This is simply a way to avoid devaluing rune boots. "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity" -Martin Luther King Jr.

30-Aug-2013 19:41:51

Quick find code: 380-381-5-65435455 Back to Top