Prowla
said
:
Did you miss my question or am I not getting a reply? a simple no would suffice... please don't ignore veterans
Regarding this kind of thing, I'm actually not looking up everyone's stats in this thread and deciding who "deserves" a reply and who doesn't.
Anger Alt
said
:
In poll 33, I think the reason for the 200 defence exp question to be currently failing is because 'pures limit themselves'. Instead could a question be offered 'Would you like a warning before adding the KBD head stating that you will receive 200 defence experience?' that might be more likely to pass.
Thanks
Agreed. We wanted to offer to remove the XP altogether, since it serves no useful purpose, but assuming the question doesn't pass, a simple warning would be absolutely fine to protect pures.
Mod Ash
said
:
Prowla
said
:
Did you miss my question or am I not getting a reply? a simple no would suffice... please don't ignore veterans
Regarding this kind of thing, I'm actually not looking up everyone's stats in this thread and deciding who "deserves" a reply and who doesn't.
My stats are not as good as most vets, but you easily tell from the date underneath peoples name
Mod Ash
said
:
Anger Alt
said
:
In poll 33, I think the reason for the 200 defence exp question to be currently failing is because 'pures limit themselves'. Instead could a question be offered 'Would you like a warning before adding the KBD head stating that you will receive 200 defence experience?' that might be more likely to pass.
Thanks
Agreed. We wanted to offer to remove the XP altogether, since it serves no useful purpose, but assuming the question doesn't pass, a simple warning would be absolutely fine to protect pures.
Surely then, since you agree it doesn't actually serve a purpose, you don't even need to poll it, but just remove it anyway?
I mean, I am 100% sure that the vast majority of people voting no to that are only voting specifically to ***** Pures over. Not because they care about losing the XP or anything, but because they are just bitter people who get a kick from limiting people with different playstyles to themselves.
Not to mention there isn't even an actual reason for it to give defence XP anyway - it's completely random and there's no need for Construction to give Def XP.
I'd also safely assume that most people don't even know it actually exists anyway, and flat out removing it (without even mentioning anything) most people would never even notice lol
I'm personally not a Pure or anything, so I'm not saying this because I'm biased in their favour. I just find it incredibly sad, and pitiful, that people would vote no specifically to ***** other players over.
"My stats are not as good as most vets, but you easily tell from the date underneath peoples name"
The number under your name is just how long you've been subscribed without any lapses, it just means how long you've paid them on time. It's actually a very cheap trick by jagex to keep you subscribed with peer pressure and whatnot. Shows that they really don't care about anything but our money (at least the upper management).
I'm going to claim my 10 year vet cape this summer and I have no sense of entitlement, you're being very silly.
On topic I'd like to voice my dissatisfaction with the amount of developers on the OSRS team, it doesn't seem adequate with the quality of the content (continued fixes every week for over a month for the delayed achievement diary), amount of content and how long it takes for the players to receive the content after being announced.
10 year vet cape
14-May-2015 12:05:38
- Last edited on
14-May-2015 12:09:04
by
ForagingCape
"I'm going to claim my 10 year vet cape this summer and I have no sense of entitlement, you're being very silly."
it was just a comment, I wasn't even going to ask a question, but it seemed like ash was answering everyones, so I thought why not... how often do you actually get to ask a developer a major game question.
as for the vet cape good luck with that I was disappointed with the emote