Forums

Dev Blog: Content Poll #32

Quick find code: 380-381-166-65607021

Amaveo

Amaveo

Posts: 61 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I dont understand why such a small but crucial item as the permanent kq ropes is being bound to the elite diaries. The requirements for the elite diaries are way too high and as u probably know alot of players despise skilling. The diaries are already in the favour of the skillers and in my opinion this should be balanced out. This is a huge blow in the pvm'ers stomach, as it's mainly them who been the asking party for this udpate. I would suggest to bind it it to a lower diary or make it permanent for everyone

16-Apr-2015 11:53:27

Stiglietz

Stiglietz

Posts: 250 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Amaveo said :
I dont understand why such a small but crucial item as the permanent kq ropes is being bound to the elite diaries. The requirements for the elite diaries are way too high and as u probably know alot of players despise skilling. The diaries are already in the favour of the skillers and in my opinion this should be balanced out. This is a huge blow in the pvm'ers stomach, as it's mainly them who been the asking party for this udpate. I would suggest to bind it it to a lower diary or make it permanent for everyone

I agree with this.

16-Apr-2015 12:06:13

Odokuro

Odokuro

Posts: 248 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
So, I just vote no to the permanent rope being added to the KQ lair ONLY on elite diaries. That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever seen. It should be a permanent feature regardless of what diary you have completed. Or at least, make it a medium reward or something realistic.

NOT EVERY SUPER HIGH LEVEL has the required stats to complete the Elite Diary. And not every Super High Level likes to/can kill the KQ. I for one can kill the KQ and would love to benefit from not having to bring a rope. Why should I have to complete the Elite Diary.

Nonsense.

I am also confounded as to why people don't want the Crystal Halberd buffed. It was useless upon its arrival into the game...

16-Apr-2015 12:33:07

PvM Jack
Jul Member 2011

PvM Jack

Posts: 2,367 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Astralach said :
Not a bad poll overall, but not a great one either. I really hope that co-op Slayer does not pass, there's too much risk of it going badly wrong due to the lack of quality assurance.


What, may I ask, can possibly go wrong since they've cleared up the issue of blocking tasks and that neither of the two people know what task is until they get it??
„«°'´`'°»„¸ . ,•°¨ 07 Rebellion ¨°•, . ¸„«°'´`'

¨°•, . ¸„«°https://discord.gg/sCKPXd . ,•°¨`'°»„¸

16-Apr-2015 13:21:37

PvM Jack
Jul Member 2011

PvM Jack

Posts: 2,367 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
@Mod Ronan, can you please specify on the blog that this is strictly only for fun purposes and people will not be able to abuse this in one way or another..

Otherwise it might fail due to lack of information, again.
„«°'´`'°»„¸ . ,•°¨ 07 Rebellion ¨°•, . ¸„«°'´`'

¨°•, . ¸„«°https://discord.gg/sCKPXd . ,•°¨`'°»„¸

16-Apr-2015 13:24:11

RSB Fox
Dec Member 2015

RSB Fox

Posts: 3,481 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
1. You should have put off the slayer partner poll like the soul cull.

2. You did not make the dev blog clear enough for most.

You should have just said the only way to get the same tasks every time is:
For both players to have the same slayer level range as it would apply to tasks. i.e both 90-93 or both 93+
Same quests done. i.e. Cabin fever.
Block list.
Combat level range to be assigned same task set. i.e. 110+ cb for dark beasts.

I know independently assigned means exactly that, but that would require people reading these dev blogs to understand a big word. :p

3. The way it's worded in the poll is debatably abusable because the wording is vague enough that it could easily allow lower level boosters to determine what task the other player gets.

"If you receive a task that your partner has blocked, or lacks the requirements to do, they will not receive the task."

The poll isn't clear that the "you" receiving the task means both players at the same time.

If the "you" refers to only player asking for the task, then the other player could potentially miss out on tasks the "you" can not do.

Should have been worded like this.

"If you OR your partner is assigned a task the other can not do, you will get different tasks."

Has be written like this because if it's programed so the player asking for the task gets one, and then it's checked against partners requirements after, that allows boosting.

Even if that's unintended and not agreeing with dev blogs wording, it could still be said to be agreeable with the pollings wording.

Has to be programed in a way that the rng randomly selects any task the master assigns.

Checks it against both and assigns task to either if they can do it, or removes that task from list and rerolls if both can not.

Meaning either it will keep rerolling till both get same task, or one gets a task, and then other will reroll till they get a different task.

That is how I would do it.
Maxed OSRS player / Community Helper @JagexHelpFox / Owner emeritus divine valor social clan.

16-Apr-2015 14:15:09

fr0stys
Aug Member 2023

fr0stys

Posts: 135 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
everything seems decent on here after the slayer part was fixed, i agree on ropes being lower on diary if not free, when are we going to make use of the 3 god eggs? I know they were used in summoning for the bird pets, perhaps something new or even them? sucks to be dropping them constantly from not being able to use. would also be a little cool having a dumbed down version of overloads, but with super set, originally i thought the super combat potion would be a great potion to do that with, otherwise I don't personally see much point in that one that makes the cost worthwhile besides saving 2 inventory spots.

16-Apr-2015 14:22:09

Quick find code: 380-381-166-65607021 Back to Top