Forums
Dev blog: PDC & Poll #12
Quick find code: 380-381-10-65435465
Voted for the Agility Reborn thing. Anything for a clannie and a good idea!
Freeknights cc - Amazing family/social clan
Freeknights cc - Amazing family/social clan
27-Oct-2013 10:49:04
Original message details are unavailable.
... I though Atronach was a generic term used by Bethesda, I was sure I'd heard it elsewhere. Mod Ash if you can check the emails to confirm it was me who sent in the suggestion (which at the bottom has my RL first name and IGN) then an updated name idea could be "Storm Titan" that would sound decent I think.
I think we'd have to rule out Storm Atronach as a name, whoever came up with it, unless someone finds a prior example of atronachs in the public domain. To be honest, there's no benefit for OSRS in taking a risk with copyright infringement just to use one name rather than another.
I'm up for calling it some kind of titan, anyway. Might go for a rock/mining name rather than something weather-related.
Original message details are unavailable.
A button will be added to your options menu, allowing you to have your POH rendered with its doors already open: Yes, but shouldn't this be on your House Options, not your main options?
Yes, that's the options menu where it'd go.
Original message details are unavailable.
The Chop option used Stab from 28 August 2007 to 22 October 2007. This makes that seem to me that it was a glitch. I say 75% Yes, Crush*****; 25% No, Slash.
I wondered when that got changed before. Thanks.
Original message details are unavailable.
In other words Jagex isn't giving us a choice to choose either we want these updates or not. they are just forcing ut to us. I really hope this can be changed since oldschool is already perfect in my opinion and we don't need crappy minigames like this.
In Mat's 'Player made content' blog from 18th October, it says " In order for the content to be added to the game it must reach 75% approval in a content poll. "
This current survey is to decide which of the 5 shortlisted ideas should be offered in that content poll.
Original message details are unavailable.
So the "accurate" mode won't even be any more accurate than the aggressive mode, in fact it will be less accurate because it will be +85 crush (or w/e it is) against +132 slash.
At present, the Accurate mode is no better than being unarmed. If you switch into that by mistake, you've got a problem.
While the Aggressive mode is very accurate, the concern was that we'd make an uber-accurate mode if we had the Accurate mode's calculation applied to that stab-attack bonus.
As with many of the things that turn up in these polls, if you don't like it, please vote No. Then, if there's still substantial interest on the forums, we can poll a different version later.
Original message details are unavailable.
Funny how they don't detail to us/you how limited they are with Runetek 3 specifically, yet still allow players to suggest content, and additions to the game, that WILL NOT be unique at all.
I'm having trouble working out what this is asking about Runetek 3.
Whenever questions arise about big game engine rewrites, I'm afraid our answer will tend to be "this is not likely to ever happen for OSRS". The engine rewrites tended to involve multiple engine developers working for weeks, with a group of content developers adjusting parts of the game to match what's changed in the engine, and the whole QA team re-testing all quests and major features to make sure they haven't broken. We don't have that sort of staffing.
So instead we offer what we can with the engine that is available to us.
... I though Atronach was a generic term used by Bethesda, I was sure I'd heard it elsewhere. Mod Ash if you can check the emails to confirm it was me who sent in the suggestion (which at the bottom has my RL first name and IGN) then an updated name idea could be "Storm Titan" that would sound decent I think.
I think we'd have to rule out Storm Atronach as a name, whoever came up with it, unless someone finds a prior example of atronachs in the public domain. To be honest, there's no benefit for OSRS in taking a risk with copyright infringement just to use one name rather than another.
I'm up for calling it some kind of titan, anyway. Might go for a rock/mining name rather than something weather-related.
Original message details are unavailable.
A button will be added to your options menu, allowing you to have your POH rendered with its doors already open: Yes, but shouldn't this be on your House Options, not your main options?
Yes, that's the options menu where it'd go.
Original message details are unavailable.
The Chop option used Stab from 28 August 2007 to 22 October 2007. This makes that seem to me that it was a glitch. I say 75% Yes, Crush*****; 25% No, Slash.
I wondered when that got changed before. Thanks.
Original message details are unavailable.
In other words Jagex isn't giving us a choice to choose either we want these updates or not. they are just forcing ut to us. I really hope this can be changed since oldschool is already perfect in my opinion and we don't need crappy minigames like this.
In Mat's 'Player made content' blog from 18th October, it says " In order for the content to be added to the game it must reach 75% approval in a content poll. "
This current survey is to decide which of the 5 shortlisted ideas should be offered in that content poll.
Original message details are unavailable.
So the "accurate" mode won't even be any more accurate than the aggressive mode, in fact it will be less accurate because it will be +85 crush (or w/e it is) against +132 slash.
At present, the Accurate mode is no better than being unarmed. If you switch into that by mistake, you've got a problem.
While the Aggressive mode is very accurate, the concern was that we'd make an uber-accurate mode if we had the Accurate mode's calculation applied to that stab-attack bonus.
As with many of the things that turn up in these polls, if you don't like it, please vote No. Then, if there's still substantial interest on the forums, we can poll a different version later.
Original message details are unavailable.
Funny how they don't detail to us/you how limited they are with Runetek 3 specifically, yet still allow players to suggest content, and additions to the game, that WILL NOT be unique at all.
I'm having trouble working out what this is asking about Runetek 3.
Whenever questions arise about big game engine rewrites, I'm afraid our answer will tend to be "this is not likely to ever happen for OSRS". The engine rewrites tended to involve multiple engine developers working for weeks, with a group of content developers adjusting parts of the game to match what's changed in the engine, and the whole QA team re-testing all quests and major features to make sure they haven't broken. We don't have that sort of staffing.
So instead we offer what we can with the engine that is available to us.
27-Oct-2013 16:45:07
Quick find code: 380-381-10-65435465 Back to Top