xox Lola xox
said
:
Dilbert2001
said
:
Eurogamer, for instance, did not make the same reports its
sister site
Gamesindustry.biz did on the UKGC and UK Parliaments findings that loot boxes are not gambling. They did not report the failure of the Chris Lee Bills, etc. They never reported the unfavorable comments from the witness in the FTC Loot Box Open House.
oh eurogamer is your source
really
I know there are a few unethical journals always misreport but do not make corrections, or outright omitted information they hate to see like the UK DCMS Minsters said loud and clear that loot boxes is not gambling and there is no justification at all to it. Yes, shame on these shady magazines who refuse to honor "article 17" of the UNICEF.
Gamesindustry.biz is, although decisively negative on loot boxes, still willing to report things they don't want to see. They also pointed out the Belgium Gambling Commisssion director did not deny the leaking of information among a list of his "crimes". They are quite ethical to me. Can't say those like Eurogamer who don't honor Article 17 of the UNICEF to let the children to know the real facts though.