forums.rs

Forums

The net is closing in Thread is locked

Quick find code: 366-367-206-66046266

of 99
Dilbert2001
Jun Member 2006

Dilbert2001

Posts: 30,176 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
xox Lola xox said :
Yes she gave great evidence actually. I think at one point she stated that she thought that the public and health services specifically mental health funding should go into paying for research on treasure hunter.

That's likely.

Is that a regulation? Please show it then for the discussion on topic.

25-Aug-2019 01:17:00

xox Lola xox

xox Lola xox

Posts: 404 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Dilbert2001 said :
xox Lola xox said :
Yes she gave great evidence actually. I think at one point she stated that she thought that the public and health services specifically mental health funding should go into paying for research on treasure hunter.

That's likely.

Is that a regulation? Please show it then for the discussion on topic.

Pretty sure youre the only one hasn't watched it bucko.

25-Aug-2019 01:19:43

Dilbert2001
Jun Member 2006

Dilbert2001

Posts: 30,176 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
xox Lola xox said :
Dilbert2001 said :
xox Lola xox said :
Yes she gave great evidence actually. I think at one point she stated that she thought that the public and health services specifically mental health funding should go into paying for research on treasure hunter.

That's likely.

Is that a regulation? Please show it then for the discussion on topic.

Pretty sure youre the only one hasn't watched it bucko.

If you can't show anything to discuss, obviously there is nothing to discuss.

Nobody else... like bloggers or journalists can show your comment? :D

25-Aug-2019 01:26:58

xox Lola xox

xox Lola xox

Posts: 404 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
• The government is consulting on whether the regulator should be a new or existing body. The regulator will be funded by the industry in the medium term, and the government is exploring options such as fees, charges or an industry levy to put it on a sustainable footing.

• Ahead of the implementation of the new regulatory framework, we will encourage companies to take early action to address online harms.
• To assist this, the White Paper sets out high-level expectations of companies, including some specific expectations in relation to certain harms. We expect the regulator to reflect these in future codes of practice.

Hard to show who margots sources were tbh, seemed like she made no sense whatsoever, wonder why she resigned.

25-Aug-2019 01:31:13

Dilbert2001
Jun Member 2006

Dilbert2001

Posts: 30,176 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
xox Lola xox said :
• The government is consulting on whether the regulator should be a new or existing body. The regulator will be funded by the industry in the medium term, and the government is exploring options such as fees, charges or an industry levy to put it on a sustainable footing.

• Ahead of the implementation of the new regulatory framework, we will encourage companies to take early action to address online harms.
• To assist this, the White Paper sets out high-level expectations of companies, including some specific expectations in relation to certain harms. We expect the regulator to reflect these in future codes of practice.

Hard to show who margots sources were tbh, seemed like she made no sense whatsoever, wonder why she resigned.

She was talking about the regulatory framework mentioned in the White Paper, loot boxes was not mentioned there.

She did not say use other government to do loot box researches at all.

She talked about two things:
(1) Loot boxes is not gambling, so no justification to even talk about regulation.
(2) The Online Harm framework (i.e trolling, bullying, disinformation, etc) is important, and she calls for government funding.

You just tried to link the two independent topics she discussed together.

25-Aug-2019 01:46:18 - Last edited on 25-Aug-2019 01:46:46 by Dilbert2001

xox Lola xox

xox Lola xox

Posts: 404 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Dilbert2001 said :
xox Lola xox said :
• The government is consulting on whether the regulator should be a new or existing body. The regulator will be funded by the industry in the medium term, and the government is exploring options such as fees, charges or an industry levy to put it on a sustainable footing.

• Ahead of the implementation of the new regulatory framework, we will encourage companies to take early action to address online harms.
• To assist this, the White Paper sets out high-level expectations of companies, including some specific expectations in relation to certain harms. We expect the regulator to reflect these in future codes of practice.

Hard to show who margots sources were tbh, seemed like she made no sense whatsoever, wonder why she resigned.

She was talking about the regulatory framework mentioned in the White Paper, loot boxes was not mentioned there.

She did not say use other government to do loot box researches at all.

She talked about two things:
(1) Loot boxes is not gambling, so justification to even talk about regulation.
(2) The Online Harm framework (i.e trolling, bullying, disinformation, etc) is important, and she calls for government funding.

You just tried to link the two independent topics she discussed together.

That is all directly from the online harms white paper and nothing to do with maggot.

25-Aug-2019 01:47:07

xox Lola xox

xox Lola xox

Posts: 404 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Already told you what she said, not sure she knew where she was that day. Hard isn't it to see the blindingly obvious fact that treasure hunter is a gateway to gambling according to british medical experts when it is in black and white infront of you, think you need to spend more mental health funding on researching it some people do, then they forget their department said they would investigate things like gaming disorder then they resign don't know why. Russia i think

25-Aug-2019 01:51:20

Dilbert2001
Jun Member 2006

Dilbert2001

Posts: 30,176 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
xox Lola xox said :
Dilbert2001 said :
xox Lola xox said :
• The government is consulting on whether the regulator should be a new or existing body. The regulator will be funded by the industry in the medium term, and the government is exploring options such as fees, charges or an industry levy to put it on a sustainable footing.

• Ahead of the implementation of the new regulatory framework, we will encourage companies to take early action to address online harms.
• To assist this, the White Paper sets out high-level expectations of companies, including some specific expectations in relation to certain harms. We expect the regulator to reflect these in future codes of practice.

Hard to show who margots sources were tbh, seemed like she made no sense whatsoever, wonder why she resigned.

She was talking about the regulatory framework mentioned in the White Paper, loot boxes was not mentioned there.

She did not say use other government to do loot box researches at all.

She talked about two things:
(1) Loot boxes is not gambling, so justification to even talk about regulation.
(2) The Online Harm framework (i.e trolling, bullying, disinformation, etc) is important, and she calls for government funding.

You just tried to link the two independent topics she discussed together.

That is all directly from the online harms white paper and nothing to do with maggot.

Again, loot box is NOT on the Online Harm White Paper. You can do a "find" easily and find nothing.

25-Aug-2019 01:52:26

xox Lola xox

xox Lola xox

Posts: 404 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Dilbert2001 said :
xox Lola xox said :
Dilbert2001 said :
xox Lola xox said :
• The government is consulting on whether the regulator should be a new or existing body. The regulator will be funded by the industry in the medium term, and the government is exploring options such as fees, charges or an industry levy to put it on a sustainable footing.

• Ahead of the implementation of the new regulatory framework, we will encourage companies to take early action to address online harms.
• To assist this, the White Paper sets out high-level expectations of companies, including some specific expectations in relation to certain harms. We expect the regulator to reflect these in future codes of practice.

Hard to show who margots sources were tbh, seemed like she made no sense whatsoever, wonder why she resigned.

She was talking about the regulatory framework mentioned in the White Paper, loot boxes was not mentioned there.

She did not say use other government to do loot box researches at all.

She talked about two things:
(1) Loot boxes is not gambling, so justification to even talk about regulation.
(2) The Online Harm framework (i.e trolling, bullying, disinformation, etc) is important, and she calls for government funding.

You just tried to link the two independent topics she discussed together.

That is all directly from the online harms white paper and nothing to do with maggot.

Again, loot box is NOT on the Online Harm White Paper. You can do a "find" easily and find nothing.

Again I read it. On top of reading it I watched the video in my source, unlike you. Maybe someone will come discuss margots comments on how gambling isn't really her area just after stating it is her department and her views on trolls especially ones trolling women in another thread,

25-Aug-2019 02:00:05

Quick find code: 366-367-206-66046266 Back to Top